FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   >>  
read. I have only one thing to say about your other stories: they are almost as good as the one I just mentioned. I have a few words to say about these people who throw brickbats at every story they read. I wouldn't be surprised if they just read the story so they could find something wrong with it. There's one in particular who wrote a few lines in the June issue about your taking the word "science" off the front page, saying there was no science in the magazine, anyway. What does the title say? Well that's what 90% of the Readers want, anyway. I hope that chap reads this. Well, I'll sign off. Here is a little toast to the magazine: "Long may it live."--Earl Rogers, 409--16th St., Galveston, Tex. _Two, Better Than One?_ Dear Editor: The two outstanding stories in the May issue of A. S. were "The Death Cloud," by Nat Schachner and Arthur L. Zagat, and "Dark Moon," by Charles W. Diffin. Common reasoning tells me that the heads of two Science Fiction writers can formulate a story better than one. I couldn't help admire Mr. Schachner and Mr. Zagat when I read their story because of the cleverness shown in it. Please give us a story by them every month.--Ray Y. Tilford, Rockport, Ky. "_And Here I Am_" Dear Editor: It's about time for me to concede that your or "our" magazine is the best I have read. Ten issues have come into my hands and I am perfectly well satisfied with the line of fiction that you publish. I have read about fifty different magazines on the market, and I am sure that Astounding Stories is the best of them all. I have followed the magazine for seven months and that is the best amount of reading any magazine can boast for me. In your case, if the magazine lasts seventy years, you can be sure that I will read it for that period of time (provided I live that long). I notice that several brickbats have come into your hands and that you have printed them. Well, that shows sportsmanship on your part. I would suggest to those who are not satisfied with Astounding Stories to duck their head in a pail of water and pull it out after a period of ten minutes. Those who criticize the stories because of the lack of science have no idea what it takes to write a story. Please be
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   >>  



Top keywords:

magazine

 

science

 

stories

 

period

 
Stories
 

Astounding

 

Editor

 
satisfied
 

Please

 
Schachner

brickbats

 
perfectly
 

market

 

mentioned

 
publish
 

fiction

 

magazines

 

issues

 

Rockport

 

Tilford


people

 

concede

 

suggest

 
criticize
 

minutes

 

sportsmanship

 
months
 

amount

 

reading

 

seventy


printed

 

notice

 

provided

 

Rogers

 
Galveston
 

Better

 
taking
 

Readers

 

outstanding

 
surprised

formulate

 

writers

 
Fiction
 

Science

 
couldn
 

cleverness

 
wouldn
 
admire
 

reasoning

 
Common