o none effect, then should I
be much more sorry and full of heaviness.
And as for myself I have done and understood in the matter that I can
and may, as good[77] knoweth: and I let you plainly understand that my
father will no more money part withal in that behalf but L100 and one
mark which is right far from the accomplishment of your desire.
Wherefore if that ye could be content with that good, and my poor
person, I would be the merriest maiden on ground. And if ye think not
yourself so satisfied, or that ye might have much more good, as I have
understood by you afore--good, true, and loving Valentine,[78] that ye
take no such labour upon you as to come more for that matter but let it
pass and never more be spoken of, as I may be your true lover and
bedeswoman[79] during my life.
No more unto you at this time but Almighty Jesus preserve you both body
and soul.
By your Valentine,
M. B.
FOOTNOTES:
[75] It is to be feared that "My Lord's" action was rather piratical.
The "Spanish Fleet" was of merchantmen ("convoyed" perhaps) on their way
to the North with iron etc. for fish, silk, etc., and we were not
definitely at war with Spain. But Henry the IV. of Castile was an ally
of France. Warwick had just been appointed "Captain of Calais," and it
was a general English idea that anything not English in the Channel was
fair prize. Warwick's conduct was warmly welcomed in London.
[76] This use of "abord" and that just before are slightly different
derivatives of the French _aborder_, which means to "approach,"
"accost," "come together with" as well as to "board" in the naval sense.
The first use here is evidently of the more general, the second of the
particular kind.
[77] This may be a mere mis-spelling of "God," or a sort of euphemism
like the modern "thank _goodness_!" to avoid the more sacred name.
[78] "I would" or "take care" or something similar to be supplied to
make a somewhat softened imperative.
[79] One who prays for you.
ROGER ASCHAM (1515-1568)
Although the old phrase about "the schoolmaster being
abroad" has never before had anything like the amount of
applicableness which it now possesses, there is perhaps
still a certain prejudice against schoolmasters. Indeed even
some who have more than served time in that capacity will
admit that it is a dangerous employment, profession, or
vocation. But if all of us had been ever, or ever would try
|