FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>   >|  
y are flatly opposed to and directly subversive of each other. What service, then, has the Princeton professor, with all his ingenuity and all his zeal, rendered the "peculiar institution?" Their gratitude must be of a stamp and complexion quite peculiar, if they can thank him for throwing their "domestic system" under the weight of such Christian requisitions as must at once crush its snaky head "and grind it to powder." And what, moreover, is the bearing of the Christian requisitions, which Professor Hodge quotes, upon the definition of slavery which he has elaborated? "All the ideas which necessarily enter into the definition of slavery are, deprivation of personal liberty, obligation of service at the discretion of another, and the transferable character of the authority and claim of service of the master."[86] [Footnote 86: Pittsburg pamphlet p. 12.] _According to Professor Hodge's _According to Professor Hodge's account of the definition of Slavery_, requisitions of Christianity_, The spring of effort in the The laborer must serve at the laborer is a fair compensation. discretion of another. Free scope must be given for He is deprived of personal his moral and intellectual liberty--the necessary condition, improvement. and living soul of improvement, without which he has no control of either intellect or morals. His rights as a husband and The authority and claims of the a father are to be protected. master may throw an ocean between him and his family, and separate them from each other's presence at any moment and forever. Christianity, then, requires such slavery as Professor Hodge so cunningly defines, to be abolished. It was well provided for the peace of the respective parties, that he placed _his definition_ so far from _the requisitions of Christianity_. Had he brought them into each other's presence, their natural and invincible antipathy to each other would have broken out into open and exterminating warfare. But why should we delay longer upon an argument which is based on gross and monstrous sophistry? It can mislead only such as _wish_ to be misled. The lovers of sunlight are in little d
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

definition

 

Professor

 

requisitions

 

Christianity

 

slavery

 

service

 
Christian
 

presence

 

personal

 

authority


master
 

laborer

 

discretion

 

improvement

 

liberty

 

According

 

peculiar

 

requires

 
forever
 

moment


flatly

 
opposed
 

defines

 

provided

 

respective

 
directly
 

abolished

 
cunningly
 

separate

 

rights


husband

 

claims

 

morals

 

intellect

 

father

 

protected

 

family

 
parties
 

subversive

 

monstrous


argument
 
longer
 

sophistry

 
mislead
 
sunlight
 
lovers
 

misled

 

natural

 

invincible

 

antipathy