FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  
Upon careful scrutiny, however, it will be found possible to decide, by examining their melodic bearing, to which phrase they pertain. In Example 22, they are manifestly (even in No. 5) a part of the present phrase; in Example 23 and 24 they are as certainly preliminary to the phrase which follows. In the following example they seem to constitute an entirely independent little "interlude," without direct reference to either phrase: [Illustration: Example 25. Fragment of Mozart.] * * * * * * THE ELISION.--Finally, there are some (very rare) instances where the composer appears to yield to the seductive influence of such extensive preliminary groups as those seen in Example 24, and by setting aside the trifling discrepancy, permits the apparent preliminary tones to represent the _actual first measure of the next phrase_. This is easily accomplished, when, as in Example 24, No. 2, it is only one 16th-note short of a full measure. And although this 16th, being the cadence-chord, is actually equivalent to the whole measure, it is sometimes less confusing to the hearer to silence it. This is called stifling the cadence (or Elision); and its presence depends simply upon sufficient proof that what was supposed to be the cadence-measure (and to a certain extent is such) is at the same time _really the first measure of the next sentence_. The following contains an illustration of the elision of a cadence: [Illustration: Example 26. Fragment of Mozart.] [Illustration: Example 26 continued.] The proofs of this very singular and apparently untrustworthy analysis are: (1) That there is absolutely no doubt about the first cadence, marked *; (2) that a cadence is consequently due, and expected, four measures later,--this proving the measure in question to be the "cadence-measure of the old phrase," as it is marked and as it appeals to our sense of cadence; (3) that the last four measures unmistakably represent a regular, compact phrase,--this proving that the "cadence-measure of the old phrase" is unquestionably _at the same time the first measure, or actual beginning, of the new phrase_. In a word, one measure is lost--not in effect, for the elements of the expected cadence are all present,--but in the counting. This lost measure is the stifled cadence-measure, omitted by Elision. Such cases are, as stated, very rare; so rare that the student will do wisely to leave them quite
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

measure

 
cadence
 

phrase

 
Example
 

preliminary

 

Illustration

 

Mozart

 

Fragment

 

represent

 

proving


actual

 

Elision

 
marked
 

measures

 

expected

 

present

 
absolutely
 

untrustworthy

 
analysis
 

apparently


continued
 

extent

 

bearing

 

melodic

 

supposed

 

elision

 

decide

 

proofs

 

illustration

 

sentence


examining

 

singular

 

scrutiny

 
stifled
 
omitted
 

counting

 

elements

 
stated
 

wisely

 

student


effect

 

appeals

 

careful

 

question

 

unmistakably

 
beginning
 

unquestionably

 
regular
 

compact

 

simply