FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5588   5589   5590   5591   5592   5593   5594   5595   5596   5597   5598   5599   5600   5601   5602   5603   5604   5605   5606   5607   5608   5609   5610   5611   5612  
5613   5614   5615   5616   5617   5618   5619   5620   5621   5622   5623   5624   5625   5626   5627   5628   5629   5630   5631   5632   5633   5634   5635   5636   5637   >>   >|  
es fall at times. It keeps minor writers to a definite plan, and to English. Many of them now swelling a plethoric market, in the composition of novels, in pun-manufactories and in journalism; attached to the machinery forcing perishable matter on a public that swallows voraciously and groans; might, with encouragement, be attending to the study of art in literature. Our critics appear to be fascinated by the quaintness of our public, as the world is when our beast-garden has a new importation of magnitude, and the creatures appetite is reverently consulted. They stipulate for a writer's popularity before they will do much more than take the position of umpires to record his failure or success. Now the pig supplies the most popular of dishes, but it is not accounted the most honoured of animals, unless it be by the cottager. Our public might surely be led to try other, perhaps finer, meat. It has good taste in song. It might be taught as justly, on the whole, and the sooner when the cottager's view of the feast shall cease to be the humble one of our literary critics, to extend this capacity for delicate choosing in the direction of the matter arousing laughter. Footnotes: {1} A lecture delivered at the London Institution, February 1st, 1877. {2} Realism in the writing is carried to such a pitch in THE OLD BACHELOR, that husband and wife use imbecile connubial epithets to one another. {3} Tallemant des Reaux, in his rough portrait of the Duke, shows the foundation of the character of Alceste. {4} See Tom Jones, book viii. chapter I, for Fielding's opinion of our Comedy. But he puts it simply; not as an exercise in the quasi-philosophical bathetic. {5} Femmes Savantes: BELISE: Veux-tu toute la vie offenser la grammaire? MARTINE: Qui parle d'offenser grand'mere ni grand-pere?' The pun is delivered in all sincerity, from the mouth of a rustic. {6} Maskwell seems to have been carved on the model of Iago, as by the hand of an enterprising urchin. He apostrophizes his 'invention' repeatedly. 'Thanks, my invention.' He hits on an invention, to say: 'Was it my brain or Providence? no matter which.' It is no matter which, but it was not his brain. {7} Imaginary Conversations: Alfieri and the Jew Salomon. {8} Terence did not please the rough old conservative Romans; they liked Plautus better, and the recurring mention of the vetus poeta in his prologues, who plagued him with the crusty critical vie
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5588   5589   5590   5591   5592   5593   5594   5595   5596   5597   5598   5599   5600   5601   5602   5603   5604   5605   5606   5607   5608   5609   5610   5611   5612  
5613   5614   5615   5616   5617   5618   5619   5620   5621   5622   5623   5624   5625   5626   5627   5628   5629   5630   5631   5632   5633   5634   5635   5636   5637   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

matter

 
public
 

invention

 
critics
 

cottager

 

offenser

 

delivered

 
BELISE
 

Savantes

 

portrait


Femmes

 

imbecile

 
MARTINE
 

husband

 

connubial

 

epithets

 

Tallemant

 

bathetic

 

grammaire

 

exercise


opinion
 

Comedy

 

Fielding

 

chapter

 

Alceste

 
simply
 

character

 
foundation
 

philosophical

 

Terence


conservative
 

Salomon

 

Imaginary

 
Conversations
 

Alfieri

 

Romans

 

plagued

 

crusty

 

critical

 

prologues


Plautus

 
recurring
 
mention
 

Providence

 

rustic

 

Maskwell

 

sincerity

 

BACHELOR

 

repeatedly

 

apostrophizes