FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90  
91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   >>   >|  
in a net, then next day letting him go. Strange it is to say, but it really requires an express experience to show the true practical working of the case, and this demonstrates (inconceivable as that would have been to the Tartars) that the capture is quite equal (quoad damage to the enemy) to the killing. (1.) As to durability, was it so? The Arabs were not strong except against those who were peculiarly weak; and even in Turkey the Christian Rajah predominates. (2.) As to bigotry and principles of toleration Mr. Finlay says--and we do not deny that he is right in saying--they arose in the latter stages. This, however, was only from policy, because it was not safe to be so; and repressed only from caution. (3) About the impetuosity of the Arab assaults. Not what people think. (4.) About the permanence or continuance of this Mahometan system--we confound the religious system with the political. The religious movement engrafted itself on other nations, translated and inoculated itself upon other political systems, and thus, viz., as a principle travelling through or along new machineries, propagated itself. But here is a deep delusion. What should we Europeans think of an Oriental historian who should talk of the Christians amongst the Germans, English, French, Spaniards, as a separate and independent nation? My friend, we should say, you mistake that matter. The Christians are not a local tribe having an insulated local situation amongst Germans, French, etc. The Christians _are_ the English, Germans, etc., or the English, Germans, French, _are_ the Christians. So do many readers confer upon the Moslems or Mahometans of history a separate and independent unity. (_a_) Greek administration had a vicarious support. (_b_) Incapacity of Eastern nations to establish primogeniture. (_c_) Incapacity of Eastern nations to be progressive. FOOTNOTES: [12] '_Lackington's counter_': Lackington, an extensive seller of old books and a Methodist (see his _Confessions_) in London, viz., at the corner of Finsbury Square, about the time of the French Revolution, feeling painfully that this event drew more attention than himself, resolved to turn the scale in his own favour by a _ruse_ somewhat unfair. The French Revolution had no counter; he _had_, it was circular, and corresponded to a lighted dome above. Round the counter on a summer evening, like Phaeton round the world, the Edinburgh, the Glasgow, the Holyhead, the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90  
91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

French

 

Germans

 

Christians

 
counter
 

English

 

nations

 

political

 

religious

 
Revolution
 

system


Lackington

 
Eastern
 

Incapacity

 
independent
 

separate

 

support

 

friend

 
nation
 

vicarious

 

letting


progressive

 
primogeniture
 

establish

 

Spaniards

 

readers

 

confer

 
insulated
 

Moslems

 
history
 

situation


mistake

 

matter

 

Mahometans

 

administration

 
unfair
 
circular
 
corresponded
 

favour

 

lighted

 

Edinburgh


Glasgow

 

Holyhead

 
Phaeton
 

summer

 

evening

 

resolved

 
Methodist
 

Confessions

 

London

 

seller