FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   >>  
to the Mound-builders' skeletons than to those found in the ancient barrows of Europe. Other considerations, such as stream encroachment, and river-terrace formation, might also be brought in as presumptive arguments in favor of their great antiquity. ORIGIN OF THE MOUND-BUILDERS.--This is a question not easily answered. It brings me into no discredit before the educated world to acknowledge ignorance on this mysterious point. The study of Craniology and Philology, in connection with Ethnology, shall alone throw light on this subject. Dr. Wilson says, in his "Prehistoric Man" (p. 123), "The ethnical classification of this strange race is still an unsettled question," and he declares without fear of contradiction, "that especially concerning the Scioto Mound skull, the elevation and breadth of the frontal bone, differs essentially from the Indian, and that the cerebral development was more in accordance with the character of that singular people, who without architecture have perpetuated, in mere structures of earth, the evidences of geometric skill, a definite means of determining angles, a fixed standard of measurement, and the capacity as well as the practice of repeating geometrically constructed works of large and uniform dimensions." Undoubtedly they were skilled in agriculture, from the remains of ancient garden-beds, which were cultivated in a methodical manner. The modern Indians give no such evidence of labor. For wherever they are found they love to roam in undisputed possession of the forest, and lead an indolent life. Of course I do not assign this as a valid reason for their not being identified with the Mound-builders. An ancient race may have a degenerate offspring. Nor shall I attempt to find in the various inscriptions any clue to their Hebrew origin, or to identify that ancient people with the lost tribes, as some have dared to do. Foster inclines to regard them as emigrating from the tropics, rather than coming from the north. This would involve us in investigating the antiquity of the Mexican and Peruvian ruins, where vast works of high architecture and more advanced civilization were found than among the Mound-builders. There is little difficulty in concluding that the Aztecs, who occupied Mexico during the Spanish invasion under Cortez, were the conquerors of several races that preceded them. Among these conquered races, no doubt, were the Toltecs, who were afterwards found in such great
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   >>  



Top keywords:

ancient

 

builders

 

question

 

people

 

architecture

 

antiquity

 

indolent

 

preceded

 

forest

 

undisputed


possession

 

identified

 

reason

 

conquerors

 

Cortez

 

assign

 

remains

 

garden

 
agriculture
 

skilled


Undoubtedly

 
Toltecs
 

cultivated

 

methodical

 

evidence

 

manner

 

modern

 

Indians

 

conquered

 
degenerate

involve
 

investigating

 

coming

 

Aztecs

 
occupied
 
emigrating
 
tropics
 

Mexican

 
Peruvian
 

civilization


difficulty

 

advanced

 

concluding

 

Mexico

 

regard

 

inscriptions

 

attempt

 

offspring

 

Spanish

 

Hebrew