FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  
2 II II where _a_ = the area of steel per linear foot, _x_{II}_ = the distance from the center of the steel to the outer fiber, and _S_{II}_ = the strength of the steel in tension. Then for a beam, 12 in. wide, 2 _d_ _d_ _S_ = _a_ _S_ ( ----- - _x_ ) , II 2 II or 2 _d_ _S_ _a_ = --------------------- . _d_ _S_ ( ----- - _x_ ) II 2 II Carrying this to its conclusion, we have, for example, in a beam 12 in. deep and 12 in. wide, _S_ = 500, _S_{II}_ = 15,000, _x_{II}_ = 2-1/2 in. _a_ = 1.37 sq. in. per ft. The writer has used this formula very extensively, in calculating new work and also in checking other designs built or to be built, and he believes its results are absolutely safe. There is the further fact to its credit, that its simplicity bars very largely the possibility of error from its use. He sees no reason to introduce further complications into such a formula, when actual tests will show results varying more widely than is shown by a comparison between this simple formula and many more complicated ones. GEORGE H. MYERS, JUN. AM. SOC. C. E. (by letter).--This paper brings out a number of interesting points, but that which strikes the writer most forcibly is the tenth, in regard to elaborate theories and complicated formulas for beams and slabs. The author's stand for simplicity in this regard is well taken. A formula for the design of beams and slabs need not be long or complicated in any respect. It can easily be obtained from the well-known fact that the moment at any point divided by the distance between the center of compression and the center of tension at that point gives the tension (or compression) in the beam. The writer would place the neutral axis from 0.42 to 0.45 of the effective depth of the beam from the compression side rather than at the center, as Mr. Godfrey suggests. This higher position of the neutral axis is the one more generally shown by tests of beams. It gives the formula _M_ = 0.86 _d_ _As_ _f_, or _M_ = 0.85 _d_ _As_ _f_, which the writer believes is more accurate than _M_ = 5/6 _d_ _As_ _f_, or 0.83-1/3 _d_ _As_ _f_, which would result if the neutral axis were taken at the center of the beam. _d_ = depth of the beam from the compression side to the center
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
center
 

formula

 

writer

 
compression
 

tension

 

complicated

 
neutral
 

believes

 

simplicity

 
results

regard

 

distance

 

formulas

 
generally
 
author
 

higher

 

position

 

theories

 
points
 

result


interesting

 

number

 

strikes

 

forcibly

 

elaborate

 

effective

 

moment

 

divided

 

obtained

 

easily


design

 

Godfrey

 
respect
 

accurate

 

suggests

 
varying
 

extensively

 

calculating

 

absolutely

 

designs


checking

 

strength

 
linear
 

Carrying

 

conclusion

 
credit
 

GEORGE

 
simple
 
comparison
 
widely