FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  
ands, but they evidently did not do so until their elastic limit was passed, at which time of course they would be expected to fail. "4. With reference to columns, _A_, _B_, _C_ and _L_, which were essentially hooped columns, the failure appears to have been caused by the greater deformation which is always found in hooped columns, and which in the earlier stages of the loading is apparently due to lack of homogeneity caused by the difficulty in placing the concrete around the hooping, and in the later stage of the loading to the excessive expansion of the concrete. This greater deformation in a hooped column causes any vertical steel to pass its elastic limit at an earlier stage than in a column where the deformation is less, and therefore produces the buckling between the bands which is noted in these two sets of columns. This excessive deformation is a strong argument against the use of high working stresses in hooped columns. "In conclusion, then, it may be said that the columns reinforced with vertical round rods showed all the strength that would be expected of them by theoretical computation. The hooped columns, on the other hand, that is, the columns reinforced with circular bands and hoops, gave in all cases comparatively low results, but no conclusions can be drawn from them because the unit-strength would have been greatly increased if the columns had been larger so that the relative area of the internal core to the total area of the column had been greater." From this letter, it will be seen that every one of Mr. Godfrey's comparisons of plain _versus_ reinforced columns requires explanations which decidedly reduce, if they do not entirely destroy, the force of his criticism. This discussion can scarcely be considered complete without brief reference to the theory of longitudinal steel reinforcement for columns. The principle[R] is comparatively simple. When a load is placed on a column of any material it is shortened in proportion, within working limits, to the load placed upon it; that is, with a column of homogeneous material, if the load is doubled, the amount of shortening or deformation is also doubled. If vertical steel bars are embedded in concrete, they must shorten when the load is applied, and consequently relieve the concrete of a portion of its load. It is therefore ph
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  



Top keywords:

columns

 

hooped

 

deformation

 
column
 
concrete
 

greater

 

reinforced

 
vertical
 

material

 

loading


earlier

 

excessive

 

comparatively

 
working
 

strength

 

elastic

 

doubled

 
caused
 

expected

 
reference

applied

 
shorten
 

versus

 

comparisons

 
Godfrey
 

larger

 

portion

 

increased

 

greatly

 

relative


internal

 

letter

 

relieve

 

requires

 
principle
 

shortening

 
reinforcement
 
amount
 
shortened
 

proportion


limits

 

homogeneous

 

simple

 
longitudinal
 

criticism

 

destroy

 

decidedly

 
reduce
 

discussion

 
scarcely