FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389  
390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   >>   >|  
d in agriculture was 52 per cent. of the population. According to one set of statistics the percentage of farming families to non-farming families fell from 64 per cent, in 1904 to 60.3 per cent. in 1910 and 56 in 1914. We shall probably not be far wrong in supposing the rural population to be at present about 55 per cent, of the population. The percentage of persons actually working on the farms is another matter. As has been seen, some 30 per cent, of the 5-1/2 million farming families are engaged in agriculture as a secondary business only. It may be, therefore, that the 5-1/2 million families do not actually yield more than 10 million effective farm hands. IS RICE THE RIGHT CROP FOR JAPAN [LXXIX]. Mr. Katsuro Hara, of the College of Literature, Kyoto University, asks, "Is Japan specially adapted for the production of rice?" and answers: "Southern Japan is of course not unfit. But rice does not conform to the climate of northern Japan. This explains the reason why there have been repeated famines. By the choice of this uncertain kind of crop as the principal foodstuff the Japanese have been obliged to acquiesce in a comparatively enhanced cost of living. The tardiness of civilisation may be perhaps partly attributed to this fact. Why did our forefathers prefer rice to other cereals? Was a choice made in Japan? If the choice was made in this country the unwisdom of the choice and of the choosers is now very patent." Along with this expression of opinion may be set the following figures, showing the total production of rice and of other grain crops during the past six years, in thousands of _koku_: ---------|----------|---------------|--------|-------------|-------- Year | Barley | Naked Barley | Wheat | Barley and | Rice | | | | Wheat | ---------|----------|---------------|--------|-------------|-------- 1915 | 10,253 | 8,296 | 5,231 | 23,781 | 55,924 1916 | 9,559 | 7,921 | 5,869 | 23,350 | 58,442 1917 | 9,169 | 8,197 | 6,786 | 24,155 | 54,658 1918 | 8,368 | 7,777 | 6,431 | 22,576 | 54,699 1919 | 9,664 | 7,995 | 5,611 | 23,271 | 60,818 ---------|----------|---------------|--------|-------------|-------- From 1910 to 1919 the areas under barleys and wheat were, in _cho_, 1,771,655-1,729,148, and under rice 2,949,440-3,104,611. INNER COLONISATION _v
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389  
390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

choice

 

families

 

population

 
Barley
 

million

 
farming
 

production

 

agriculture

 

percentage

 
partly

thousands

 

attributed

 

patent

 

choosers

 

country

 

expression

 

opinion

 
unwisdom
 
prefer
 
forefathers

showing

 

cereals

 
figures
 

barleys

 

COLONISATION

 

civilisation

 

engaged

 
secondary
 

matter

 

business


effective

 

working

 

statistics

 

According

 

present

 

persons

 

supposing

 
repeated
 

famines

 
reason

explains

 

conform

 

climate

 

northern

 

uncertain

 

comparatively

 

enhanced

 

living

 

acquiesce

 

obliged