FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>   >|  
When Mr. Kennedy named his work on word analysis "What Words Say", he gave it the best possible title. Composite words have a wealth of meaning; each syllable is significant. And, as a rule, only to those who can read this significance does the word yield its full meaning. Accuracy is the mark of a scholar. Accuracy in speech and in the understanding of speech cannot be attained by those whose knowledge of words is vague and general. Pupils should early learn how to interpret _what words say_, and to discriminate carefully in the use of words, for these are the tools which they are to use in all the various departments for acquiring knowledge. Normal, Ill., Aug. 30, 1904. E. W. CAVINS. INTRODUCTION BY DR. EDWIN C. HEWETT. I have long thought that the careful, discriminating study of words is much neglected in our schools. And I am glad to approve, and help to forward, anything that will promote such a study. Not only will such a study improve a person's language greatly, but it will, at the same time, do much to improve the clearness and precision of his thinking; thought and language have a reciprocal effect. If a child, while young, can be made to be interested in words themselves,--their origin, their exact meaning, their relations to each other and some of the changes in their meaning which result from their use,--he will be likely to retain that interest through life; it will be more likely to increase than to diminish. It seems often to be assumed that a student can do nothing profitably with the study of words made up from Greek and Latin roots till he has acquired some mastery of those languages. But I know from experience and much observation that this is not true. Why should it be? Must one master Greek and Latin before he can understand that, in English words, _graph_ means write; _ge_ means earth; _phone_ means sound; _cur_ means run; _fin_ means limit; _port_ means carry, etc.? And then having learned the meaning of the prefixes and suffixes, is it preposterous to train him to know the etymological significance of a few hundred words by showing him how they are built up? Of course, we know that many words in common use have shades of meaning quite different from, and in some cases almost opposite to, their literal significance. But will not the student be better able to understand these derived meanings by knowing their literal
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

meaning

 

significance

 
Accuracy
 

speech

 

knowledge

 

student

 

thought

 
language
 

literal

 

improve


understand

 

acquired

 

mastery

 
languages
 
diminish
 

result

 

retain

 
interest
 

origin

 

relations


assumed
 

profitably

 
increase
 

experience

 

showing

 

hundred

 

preposterous

 

etymological

 

common

 
shades

derived

 

meanings

 

knowing

 
opposite
 

suffixes

 
prefixes
 
English
 

master

 

learned

 
observation

promote

 
attained
 
understanding
 

scholar

 

general

 

Pupils

 

carefully

 
discriminate
 
interpret
 

analysis