FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   >>  
elves the trouble to consider the original and foundation of this right. Pleased as we are with the possession, we seem afraid to look back to the means by which it was acquired, as if fearful of some defect in our title; or at best we rest satisfied with the decision of the laws in our favour, without examining the reason and authority upon which those laws have been built. We think it enough that our title is derived by the grant of the former proprietor, by descent from our ancestors, or by the last will and testament of the dying owner; not caring to reflect that (accurately and strictly speaking) there is no foundation in nature, or in natural law, why a set of words upon parchment should convey the dominion of land; why the son should have a right to exclude his fellow creature from a determinate spot of ground, because his father had so done before him; or why the occupier of a particular field, or of a jewel, when lying on his death bed, and no longer able to maintain possession, should be entitled to tell the rest of the world which of them should enjoy it after him.--(2 _Blac. Comm._ 2) "The _two sheriff's of London_ are the _one sheriff of Middlesex_; thus constituting in the latter case, what may be denominated, in the words of _George Colman the Younger_, (see his address to the Reviewers, in his _vagaries_,) 'a plural unit.' Henry the First, in the same charter by which he declared and confirmed the privileges of the City of _London_, (and among others, that of choosing their own sheriffs,) conferred on them, in consideration of an annual rent of 300_l._, to be paid to his majesty and his successors for ever, the perpetual sheriffalty of _Middlesex_. This was an enormous price; 300_l._. in those days were equal to more than three times as many thousands at the present time. Here is a lively commentary upon the _Inclosure Acts_: "To a pamphlet which was published some years ago, against the propriety of enclosing _Waltham Forest_, the following quaint motto was prefixed: "The fault is great in man or woman, Who steals a goose from off a common, But who can plead that man's excuse, Who steals the common from the goose?" How to decide a Chancery Suit: "The _Shellys_ were a family of distinction in _Sussex_. _Richard_ and _Thomas Shelly_ were
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   >>  



Top keywords:

steals

 
London
 

Middlesex

 
common
 

possession

 

sheriff

 
foundation
 

majesty

 

enormous

 

plural


Younger

 
perpetual
 

Reviewers

 

address

 

sheriffalty

 

vagaries

 

successors

 
declared
 

confirmed

 

privileges


charter

 

sheriffs

 

conferred

 

consideration

 

choosing

 
annual
 
quaint
 

prefixed

 
excuse
 

Sussex


Richard
 

Thomas

 

Shelly

 

distinction

 
family
 

decide

 

Chancery

 

Shellys

 
Forest
 

present


thousands

 
lively
 

commentary

 

Inclosure

 

propriety

 
enclosing
 

Waltham

 
Colman
 

pamphlet

 

published