FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143  
144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   >>   >|  
sion of labour between the sexes was not in any sense an arrangement dictated by men, nor did they impose the women's tasks upon them. The view that the women are forced to work by the laziness of the men, and that their heavy and incessant labour is a proof of their degraded position is entirely out of focus. Quite the reverse is the truth. Evidence is not wanting of the great advantage arising to women from their close connection with labour. It was largely their control over the food supply and their position as actual producers which gave them so much influence, and even authority in the mother-age. In this connection I may quote the statement of Miss Werner about the African women as representing the true conditions-- "I cannot say that, so far as my own observations went, the women's lot seemed to be a specially hard one. In fact, they are too important an element in the community not to be treated with consideration. The fact that they do most of the heavy field-work does not imply that they are a down-trodden sex. On the contrary, it gives them a considerable pull, as a man will think twice before endangering his food supply."[173] [173] "Our Subject Races," _The Reformer_, April 1897, p. 43. Mr. Horatio Hale, a well-known American anthropologist likewise observes-- "The common opinion that women among savage tribes in general are treated with harshness, and regarded as slaves, or at least as inferiors, is, like many common opinions, based on error, originating in too large and indiscriminate deduction from narrow premises.... The wife of a Samoan landowner or Navajo shepherd has no occasion, so far as her position in her family or among her people, to envy the wife of a German peasant."[174] [174] _Journal Anthropological Institute_, May 1892, p. 427, cited by H. Ellis. Certainly savage women do not count their work as any degradation. There is really an equal division of labour between the sexes, though the work of the men is accomplished more fitfully than that of the women. The militant activities of fighting and hunting are essential in primitive life. The women know this, and they do their share--the industrial share, willingly, without question, and without compulsion. It is entirely absurd in this work-connection to regard men as the oppressors of women. Rather the advantage is on the women's side.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143  
144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

labour

 

connection

 
position
 

advantage

 
supply
 

savage

 

treated

 

common

 

slaves

 

deduction


indiscriminate

 
narrow
 

Horatio

 

regarded

 
landowner
 
Navajo
 
shepherd
 

general

 

Samoan

 
premises

harshness
 

likewise

 

inferiors

 

observes

 
opinion
 
anthropologist
 

opinions

 

originating

 

American

 

tribes


activities
 

fighting

 

hunting

 

essential

 

militant

 

accomplished

 

fitfully

 

primitive

 

regard

 
oppressors

Rather

 
absurd
 
compulsion
 

industrial

 

willingly

 
question
 

division

 
peasant
 

Journal

 
Anthropological