FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145  
146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   >>   >|  
gmatism, is offset by this: that the oval pupil functions as a stenopaic slit. In view of the width of the horse's pupil this appears to me to be rather hypothetical. Concerning Berlin's theory of deflecting astigmatism I would say the following: Of the two ophthalmoscopic signs mentioned as being characteristic of this form of astigmatism,--the concentric circles and the arcuate deflection of the pathway of the fixated points,--when there is a movement of the eye of the observer (or of the eye observed), according to Berlin the former is not so constant as the latter. So far as I know, the concentric ring formation is mentioned only by Bayer[47] and Riegel,[48] and is said to occur principally in horses with myopic vision--and hence, relatively, in a minority of cases. Judging from the particulars, we are inclined to believe that a case of "Butzenscheiben"-lens reported by Schwendimann[48_a_] is in reality a case of senile sclerosis. Berlin repeatedly warns us against mistaking the one for the other.[48_b_] The arcuate deflection, on the other hand, has not been mentioned elsewhere as a personal observation. In Berlin's calculation[49] of the increase in the extent of the retinal pathway an ambiguity has crept in. He says that "in the astigmatic eye there are stimulated 207 times as many nervous elements as would be stimulated in the ideally normal eye." It ought to read "207 more" instead of "207 times as many." And this number holds only for the one case computed by Berlin, and under the specific assumption that exactly [Greek: pi]/2 times the normal number of elements were stimulated (571 instead of 364). Therefore the general statement which Bayer[50] makes in his text-book, that according to Berlin's evaluation "207 times more nervous elements" are stimulated in the astigmatic eye than in the non-astigmatic one, does not hold true. Closing this note, a few remarks concerning the experiments made by Dr. Simon and myself. All of the nine horses were tested for the vertical image by means of the ophthalmoscope. In most cases Wolff's electric speculum was used. Atropine was not employed.--For the laboratory tests the adipose and the muscular tissues were removed from the eye-ball and the rear part of the bulb cut away. The front part, containing the cornea and the lens, was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145  
146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Berlin

 

stimulated

 
mentioned
 

elements

 

astigmatic

 

deflection

 

arcuate

 

pathway

 

nervous

 
concentric

astigmatism
 

horses

 

normal

 
number
 
statement
 

general

 

Therefore

 
computed
 

ideally

 
specific

assumption

 
employed
 
laboratory
 

Atropine

 

electric

 

speculum

 
adipose
 

muscular

 

cornea

 
tissues

removed
 

ophthalmoscope

 

Closing

 

remarks

 

evaluation

 

experiments

 

tested

 

vertical

 

fixated

 
points

movement
 
circles
 

characteristic

 

observer

 

constant

 
observed
 

ophthalmoscopic

 

stenopaic

 

functions

 

gmatism