FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  
s next acted, remember the beef. In the same scene _Bernardo_ inquires "Is _Horatio_ here?" who answers "A piece of him." Warburton, that _bow-wow_, "dog in forehead," says this signifies his _hand_, which direction should be marked. But how if his hand be not marked? It is not every player who has committed manslaughter on anybody but his author. In my opinion, an actor who scorns to be a mannerist will take it to signify his leg, which is quite as good a _piece_ of him, as his hand, and, if he be a dancer, a much better. My interpretation of this passage is strengthened by the usage of the clown in the dramatic entertainment entitled _Mother Goose_. When the late Mr. Lewis Bologna, as Pantaloon, proffered his hand in token of amity and forgiveness, Mr. Joseph Grimaldi protruded his foot into his master's palm. His reading was certainly the right one. In the course of conversation, _Horatio_ asks, "What! has this _thing_ appeared again to night?" which is both irreverent and nonsensical. A _ghost_ is not a _thing_. _Macbeth_ says to that of _Banquo_, "_Unreal_ mockery, hence!" The passage should be "Has this king appeared?" _Bernardo._ Sit down a while And let us once again assail your ears, That are so fortified against our story, What we _two nights_ have seen. This allusion to fortified ears, implies that the parties wore helmets that covered these organs. For we two _nights_, therefore, read "we two knights." Knights were at that time soldiers. So Joppa in his prophecy of the year 1790. The knight now, his helmet on, The spear and falchion handles; But knights _then_, as thick as hops, In bushy bobs shall keep their shops, And deal, good lack! in figs and tripe, And soap, and tallow candles. The ghost now enters, and retreats like _lord Burleigh_, in the _critic_. _Bernardo._ See, it _stalks_ away. _Walks_, if you please, Mr. _Bernardo_. I have heard of stalking horses indeed, and that of Troy made many ghosts. But _ghosts_ themselves _walk_. In speaking to it _afterwards_, _Horatio_ says, "You spirits oft _walk_." "He durst as soon have met the devil in fight," as have said "_stalk_." The shades of difference in the meaning of these two words were nicely marked in a pantomime song of the late Mr. EDWIN, in which he courteously applied the word "walk" to the softer sex, Then ma'am will you _walk_ in, sing folderol liddle, And sir, will you _stalk_ in, sing folderol li
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Bernardo

 

Horatio

 
marked
 

ghosts

 

passage

 

appeared

 

fortified

 
nights
 

folderol

 

knights


Knights

 

handles

 

implies

 
parties
 
prophecy
 

organs

 

knight

 
covered
 

falchion

 

helmets


helmet
 

soldiers

 
meaning
 

difference

 

nicely

 

pantomime

 

shades

 

liddle

 

courteously

 
applied

softer

 

stalks

 

critic

 
Burleigh
 

enters

 
candles
 
retreats
 

speaking

 

spirits

 
stalking

horses

 
allusion
 
tallow
 

mannerist

 

signify

 

scorns

 

author

 
opinion
 
dancer
 

dramatic