FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210  
211   212   213   214   215   216   >>  
s recoverable in the first cracking and Duke was nearly as bad, varying from 69 to 98 per cent recovery. After careful study of these six charts, I am sure you will have to admit that any judgment of a black walnut variety based on these characters only is none too dependable. These are the nut characters that we have been using in our contest! Some further method of evaluation is needed! Individual nut characters alone are not enough. A good farmer is concerned in quality of his produce but quantity is of more importance for financial success. The Elberta peach well illustrates this. There are many peaches of better quality, but the Elberta peach is a prolific producer and this is one reason more Elberta peaches are raised than any other variety. Quality without quantity means little. With this in mind, the $50.00 sweepstakes prize was offered for the tree with the best five-year record. The judges interpreted this to mean the most pound of kernels produced that were recovered on first crack. Going back over the records, we find some trees have been much more productive than others. At first it would seem unfair to compare the crop from trees of different size and age, but this time luck was with the judges. Take a look at Table No. 7 which gives the ages and sizes of the trees. There is not too much difference in size or age to make reasonable comparisons possible. However, it should be clearly understood that only trees of the same age growing in the same orchard and receiving the same care can be accurately compared. The trees we are dealing with were in different localities, with vast differences in soil conditions, air drainage, climate, etc. Table No. 7 gives the total production for the five-year period for each tree, in bushels, the total amount of kernel as well as the amount of kernel recovered at first cracking. Only five trees had produced over four bushels of nuts each during the five year period. The Oliver tree produced 1.8 bushels and 25 pounds more kernels than the Penn tree. The Kuhn tree, though producing four bushels less nuts than the Penn tree, did produce 4.1 pounds more kernels, with the same amount recovered on first cracking from the nuts of each tree--almost a photo finish for second place. The sweepstakes award of $50.00 was therefore given to Mrs. Oliver Shaffer, of Lucasville, Ohio, who sent in the Oliver entry. Referring to the case histories of these trees as written up
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210  
211   212   213   214   215   216   >>  



Top keywords:

bushels

 

cracking

 

recovered

 

Elberta

 

characters

 

Oliver

 
produced
 

amount

 

kernels

 

quantity


produce
 

period

 

judges

 

sweepstakes

 

peaches

 

quality

 

pounds

 

kernel

 
variety
 

difference


comparisons

 
However
 

finish

 

reasonable

 

histories

 
written
 

Referring

 
Lucasville
 

Shaffer

 

conditions


differences

 

drainage

 

climate

 

production

 

localities

 

dealing

 

understood

 
producing
 

growing

 

orchard


accurately
 
compared
 

receiving

 
record
 
dependable
 
walnut
 

judgment

 

contest

 

Individual

 

needed