FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216  
217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   >>  
s belief in his Church. This possession of truth, moreover, thus lightly won, is given to him as infallible. It is a system. There is nothing to add to it. At his peril let him question or take from it. To start a convert in life with such a principle is unspeakably degrading. All through life instead of working toward truth he must work from it. An infallible standard is a temptation to a mechanical faith. Infallibility always paralyzes. It gives rest; but it is the rest of stagnation. Men perform one great act of faith at the beginning of their life, then have done with it forever. All moral, intellectual and spiritual effort is over; and a cheap theology ends in a cheap life. The same thing that makes men take refuge in the Church of Rome makes them take refuge in a set of dogmas. Infallibility meets the deepest desire of man, but meets it in the most fatal form. Men deal with the hunger after truth in two ways. First by Unbelief--which crushes it by blind force; or, secondly, by resorting to some external source credited with Infallibility--which lulls it to sleep by blind faith. The effect of a doctrinal theology is the effect of Infallibility. And the wholesale belief in such a system, however accurate it may be--grant even that it were infallible--is not Faith though it always gets that name. It is mere Credulity. It is a complacent and idle rest upon authority, not a hard-earned, self-obtained, personal possession. The moral responsibility here, besides, is reduced to nothing. Those who framed the Thirty-nine Articles or the Westminster Confession are responsible. And anything which destroys responsibility, or transfers it, cannot be other than injurious in its moral tendency and useless in itself. It may be objected perhaps that this statement of the paralysis spiritual and mental induced by Infallibility applies also to the Bible. The answer is that though the Bible is infallible, the Infallibility is not in such a form as to become a temptation. There is the widest possible difference between the form of truth in the Bible and the form in theology. In theology truth is propositional--tied up in neat parcels, systematized, and arranged in logical order. The Trinity is an intricate doctrinal problem. The Supreme Being is discussed in terms of philosophy. The Atonement is a formula which is to be demonstrated like a proposition in Euclid. And Justification is to be worked out as a question of jurisprudenc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216  
217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   >>  



Top keywords:

Infallibility

 

theology

 

infallible

 

refuge

 
temptation
 

responsibility

 

Church

 
possession
 

spiritual

 
question

system

 
belief
 

effect

 

doctrinal

 
destroys
 

useless

 

transfers

 

tendency

 

injurious

 

responsible


earned

 

obtained

 

authority

 
Credulity
 

complacent

 

personal

 
Articles
 

Westminster

 

Confession

 

Thirty


framed

 

reduced

 

induced

 

Supreme

 
discussed
 

problem

 
intricate
 

logical

 

Trinity

 
philosophy

Atonement

 

Justification

 
worked
 

jurisprudenc

 
Euclid
 

proposition

 
formula
 
demonstrated
 

arranged

 
systematized