FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
>>  
roller it would not only have twice, but four times more effect than on the smaller one. We will notice that the smaller the impulse angle the larger the roller, because the ruby pin is necessarily placed farther from the center. The position of the ruby pin should, therefore, govern the size of the roller, which should be as small as possible. There should only be enough metal left between the circumference of the roller and the face of the jewel to allow for a crescent or passing hollow of sufficient depth and an efficient setting for the jewel. For this reason, as well as securing the correct impulse radius and therefore angle, when replacing the ruby pin, and having it set securely and mechanically in the roller, it is necessary that the pin and the hole in the roller be of the same form, and a good fit. Fig. 23 illustrates the difference in size of rollers. In the smaller one the conditions imposed are satisfied, while in the larger one they are not. In the single roller the safety action is at the mercy of the impulse and pallet angles. We have noticed that in order to favor the impulse we require a large roller, and for the safety action a small one, therefore escapements made on fine principles are supplied with two rollers, one for each action. It may be well to say that in our opinion a proportion between the fork and impulse angles in 10deg. pallets of 3 or 3 1/2 to 1, _depending_ upon the size of the escapement, is the lowest which should be made in single roller. We have seen them in proportions of 2 to 1 in single roller--a scientific principle foolishly applied--resulting in an action entirely unsatisfactory. When the guard point is pressed against the roller the escape tooth must still rest on the locking face of the pallet; if the total lock is 2deg., by allowing 1 1/4deg. freedom for the guard point between the bank and the roller the escapement will still be locked 3/4deg. How much this shake actually amounts to depends upon the guard radius. Suppose this to be 4 mm., then the freedom would equal 4 x 2 x 3.1416 / 360 x 1.25 = .0873 mm. [Illustration: Fig. 24.] [Illustration: Fig. 25.] _The Crescent_ in the roller must be large and deep enough so it will be impossible for the guard point to touch in or on the corners of it; at the same time it must not be too large, as it would necessitate a longer horn on the fork than is necessary. Fig. 24 shows the slot _n_ of the fork standing at the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
>>  



Top keywords:

roller

 
impulse
 
action
 

single

 
smaller
 
radius
 
safety
 

pallet

 

angles

 

rollers


escapement
 

freedom

 

larger

 

Illustration

 
longer
 
necessitate
 

corners

 

pressed

 

resulting

 
unsatisfactory

applied
 

lowest

 

depending

 

standing

 
foolishly
 

principle

 

scientific

 
proportions
 

locked

 
Suppose

depends
 

amounts

 

allowing

 

impossible

 

escape

 
Crescent
 

locking

 

passing

 

hollow

 
sufficient

crescent

 

circumference

 

efficient

 

correct

 
replacing
 

securing

 

reason

 
setting
 

effect

 

notice