FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386  
387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   >>   >|  
hiefly to signify relation to creatures; and therefore it is applied in a plural sense to God; and it is not said personally. But the name of Word is imposed chiefly to signify the speaker, and consequently, relation to creatures, inasmuch as God, by understanding Himself, understands every creature; and so there is only one Word in God, and that is a personal one. Reply Obj. 5: God's knowledge of non-beings and God's Word about non-beings are the same; because the Word of God contains no less than does the knowledge of God, as Augustine says (De Trin. xv, 14). Nevertheless the Word is expressive and operative of beings, but is expressive and manifestive of non-beings. _______________________ QUESTION 35 OF THE IMAGE (In Two Articles) We next inquire concerning the image: about which there are two points of inquiry: (1) Whether Image in God is said personally? (2) Whether this name belongs to the Son alone? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [I, Q. 35, Art. 1] Whether Image in God Is Said Personally? Objection 1: It would seem that image is not said personally of God. For Augustine (Fulgentius, De Fide ad Petrum i) says, "The Godhead of the Holy Trinity and the Image whereunto man is made are one." Therefore Image is said of God essentially, and not personally. Obj. 2: Further, Hilary says (De Synod.): "An image is a like species of that which it represents." But species or form is said of God essentially. Therefore so also is Image. Obj. 3: Further, Image is derived from imitation, which implies "before" and "after." But in the divine persons there is no "before" and "after." Therefore Image cannot be a personal name in God. _On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Trin. vii, 1): "What is more absurd than to say that an image is referred to itself?" Therefore the Image in God is a relation, and is thus a personal name. _I answer that,_ Image includes the idea of similitude. Still, not any kind of similitude suffices for the notion of image, but only similitude of species, or at least of some specific sign. In corporeal things the specific sign consists chiefly in the figure. For we see that the species of different animals are of different figures; but not of different colors. Hence if the color of anything is depicted on a wall, this is not called an image unless the figure is likewise depicted. Further, neither the similitude of species or of figure is enough for an image, which requi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386  
387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

species

 

beings

 

similitude

 

Therefore

 

personally

 
personal
 

Augustine

 

figure

 
Whether
 

Further


relation
 
essentially
 

specific

 

signify

 
expressive
 

creatures

 

depicted

 

knowledge

 

chiefly

 
persons

divine

 

contrary

 
called
 

represents

 

derived

 

absurd

 
implies
 

imitation

 
colors
 
notion

suffices

 

likewise

 
consists
 

corporeal

 

figures

 

things

 

referred

 

answer

 

includes

 
animals

Nevertheless

 

operative

 

manifestive

 

QUESTION

 

imposed

 
speaker
 

plural

 

applied

 

hiefly

 
creature