FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840  
841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   >>   >|  
e are differentiated according to the distinction of the corresponding active and motive principles; because the motive must be proportionate to the movable, and the active to the passive: indeed, the passive power itself has its very nature from its relation to its active principle. Therefore, since what is apprehended by the intellect and what is apprehended by sense are generically different; consequently, the intellectual appetite is distinct from the sensitive. Reply Obj. 1: It is not accidental to the thing desired to be apprehended by the sense or the intellect; on the contrary, this belongs to it by its nature; for the appetible does not move the appetite except as it is apprehended. Wherefore differences in the thing apprehended are of themselves differences of the appetible. And so the appetitive powers are distinct according to the distinction of the things apprehended, as their proper objects. Reply Obj. 2: The intellectual appetite, though it tends to individual things which exist outside the soul, yet tends to them as standing under the universal; as when it desires something because it is good. Wherefore the Philosopher says (Rhetoric. ii, 4) that hatred can regard a universal, as when "we hate every kind of thief." In the same way by the intellectual appetite we may desire the immaterial good, which is not apprehended by sense, such as knowledge, virtue, and suchlike. _______________________ QUESTION 81 OF THE POWER OF SENSUALITY (In Three Articles) Next we have to consider the power of sensuality, concerning which there are three points of inquiry: (1) Whether sensuality is only an appetitive power? (2) Whether it is divided into irascible and concupiscible as distinct powers? (3) Whether the irascible and concupiscible powers obey reason? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [I, Q. 81, Art. 1] Whether Sensuality Is Only Appetitive? Objection 1: It would seem that sensuality is not only appetitive, but also cognitive. For Augustine says (De Trin. xii, 12) that "the sensual movement of the soul which is directed to the bodily senses is common to us and beasts." But the bodily senses belong to the apprehensive powers. Therefore sensuality is a cognitive power. Obj. 2: Further, things which come under one division seem to be of one genus. But Augustine (De Trin. xii, 12) divides sensuality against the higher and lower reason, which belong to knowledge. Therefore sensuality a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840  
841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

apprehended

 

sensuality

 

appetite

 

Whether

 

powers

 

Therefore

 

things

 
appetitive
 
distinct
 
intellectual

active

 

appetible

 

cognitive

 

Augustine

 

knowledge

 

motive

 

distinction

 

Wherefore

 
differences
 

intellect


irascible

 

senses

 

belong

 
nature
 

bodily

 

reason

 

concupiscible

 

passive

 
universal
 

divided


Articles

 

SENSUALITY

 

points

 

inquiry

 
beasts
 
apprehensive
 

common

 

movement

 

directed

 

Further


higher

 

divides

 

division

 

sensual

 
ARTICLE
 

Sensuality

 

Objection

 

Appetitive

 
contrary
 

desired