FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690  
691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   >>   >|  
ionysius (Div. Nom. iv) includes Light among the intellectual names of God. But such names are used in their proper sense in spiritual things. Therefore light is used in its proper sense in spiritual matters. Obj. 3: Further, the Apostle says (Eph. 5:13): "All that is made manifest is light." But to be made manifest belongs more properly to spiritual things than to corporeal. Therefore also does light. _On the contrary,_ Ambrose says (De Fide ii) that "Splendor" is among those things which are said of God metaphorically. _I answer that,_ Any word may be used in two ways--that is to say, either in its original application or in its more extended meaning. This is clearly shown in the word "sight," originally applied to the act of the sense, and then, as sight is the noblest and most trustworthy of the senses, extended in common speech to all knowledge obtained through the other senses. Thus we say, "Seeing how it tastes," or "smells," or "burns." Further, sight is applied to knowledge obtained through the intellect, as in those words: "Blessed are the clean of heart, for they shall see God" (Matt. 5:8). And thus it is with the word light. In its primary meaning it signifies that which makes manifest to the sense of sight; afterwards it was extended to that which makes manifest to cognition of any kind. If, then, the word is taken in its strict and primary meaning, it is to be understood metaphorically when applied to spiritual things, as Ambrose says (De Fide ii). But if taken in its common and extended use, as applied to manifestation of every kind, it may properly be applied to spiritual things. The answer to the objections will sufficiently appear from what has been said. _______________________ SECOND ARTICLE [I, Q. 67, Art. 2] Whether Light Is a Body? Objection 1: It would seem that light is a body. For Augustine says (De Lib. Arb. iii, 5) that "light takes the first place among bodies."Therefore light is a body. Obj. 2: Further, the Philosopher says (Topic. v, 2) that "light is a species of fire." But fire is a body, and therefore so is light. Obj. 3: Further, the powers of movement, intersection, reflection, belong properly to bodies; and all these are attributes of light and its rays. Moreover, different rays of light, as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. ii) are united and separated, which seems impossible unless they are bodies. Therefore light is a body. _On the contrary,_ Two bodies cannot occu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690  
691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

spiritual

 

applied

 
things
 

Therefore

 

extended

 
Further
 

manifest

 

bodies

 
properly
 

meaning


primary

 

answer

 

metaphorically

 

obtained

 
knowledge
 

common

 

senses

 

proper

 

Ambrose

 

contrary


Whether

 

manifestation

 

Objection

 

ARTICLE

 

sufficiently

 

objections

 

SECOND

 

belong

 

attributes

 
Philosopher

reflection

 

species

 

movement

 
intersection
 
powers
 
Moreover
 

separated

 

Augustine

 
impossible
 

united


Dionysius

 
original
 
Splendor
 
application
 

noblest

 

originally

 
intellectual
 

includes

 

ionysius

 

matters