FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212  
213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   >>   >|  
que ne fuit rebaile as commons. A singular assertion is made in the Year Book 21 E. IV. p. 48 (Maynard's edit.), that a subsidy granted by the commons without assent of the peers is good enough. This cannot surely have been law at that time. [249] Rot. Parl. vol. iii. p. 244. [250] Coke's 4th Institute, p. 15. [251] Glanvil's Reports of Elections, edit. 1774; Introduction, p. 12. [252] 4 Prynne, p. 261. [253] Glanvil's Reports, ibid. from Prynne. [254] Glanvil's Reports, ibid. from Prynne. [255] Id. ibid. and Rot. Parl. vol. iii. p. 530. [256] Rot. Parl. vol. v. p. 7. [257] 3 Prynne's Register, p. 187. This hypothesis, though embraced by Prynne, is, I confess, much opposed to general opinion; and a very respectable living writer treats such an interpretation of the statute 7 H. IV. as chimerical. The words cited in the text, "as others," mean only, according to him, suitors not duly summoned. Heywood on Elections, vol. i. p. 20. But, as I presume, the summons to freeholders was by general proclamation; so that it is not easy to perceive what difference there could be between summoned and unsummoned suitors. And if the words are supposed to glance at the private summonses to a few friends, by means of which the sheriffs were accustomed to procure a clandestine election, one can hardly imagine that such persons would be styled "duly summoned." It is not unlikely, however, that these large expressions were inadvertently used, and that they led to that inundation of voters without property which rendered the subsequent act of Henry VI. necessary. That of Henry IV. had itself been occasioned by an opposite evil, the close election of knights by a few persons in the name of the county. Yet the consequence of the statute of Henry IV. was not to let in too many voters, or to render elections tumultuous, in the largest of English counties, whatever it might be in others. Prynne has published some singular sheriff's indentures for the county of York, all during the interval between the acts of Henry IV. and Henry VI., which are sealed by a few persons calling themselves the attorneys of some peers and ladies, who, as far as appears, had solely returned the knights of that shire. 3 Prynne, p. 152. What degree of weight these anomalous returns ought to possess I leave to the reader. [258] The majority of prescriptive boroughs have prescriptive corporations, which carry the legal, which is not always the m
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212  
213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Prynne

 
summoned
 
Reports
 

Glanvil

 

persons

 

voters

 

suitors

 

commons

 
Elections
 

prescriptive


singular

 

knights

 

county

 

statute

 

election

 

general

 

opposite

 

clandestine

 

occasioned

 

rendered


expressions
 

inadvertently

 
imagine
 

styled

 

subsequent

 

property

 

inundation

 

degree

 

weight

 

returned


solely

 

ladies

 

attorneys

 
appears
 

anomalous

 

returns

 

corporations

 
boroughs
 

majority

 

possess


reader

 

calling

 

tumultuous

 

elections

 

largest

 

English

 

counties

 

render

 

consequence

 

procure