FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   >>   >|  
thor of the Annals of Burton.[323] They preceded, therefore, by a few years the house of commons; but the introduction of each was founded upon the same principle. The king required the clergy's money, but dared not take it without their consent.[324] In the double parliament, if so we may call it, summoned in the eleventh of Edward I. to meet at Northampton and York, and divided according to the two ecclesiastical provinces, the proctors of chapters for each province, but not those of the diocesan clergy, were summoned through a royal writ addressed to the archbishops. Upon account of the absence of any deputies from the lower clergy these assemblies refused to grant a subsidy. The proctors of both descriptions appear to have been summoned by the praemunientes clause in the 22nd, 23rd, 24th, 28th, and 35th years of the same king; but in some other parliaments of his reign the praemunientes clause is omitted.[325] The same irregularity continued under his successor; and the constant usage of inserting this clause in the bishop's writ is dated from the twenty-eighth of Edward III.[326] It is highly probable that Edward I., whose legislative mind was engaged in modelling the constitution on a comprehensive scheme, designed to render the clergy an effective branch of parliament, however their continual resistance may have defeated the accomplishment of this intention.[327] We find an entry upon the roll of his parliament at Carlisle, containing a list of all the proctors deputed to it by the several dioceses of the kingdom. This may be reckoned a clear proof of their parliamentary attendance during his reign under the praemunientes clause; since the province of Canterbury could not have been present in convocation at a city beyond its limits.[328] And indeed, if we were to found our judgment merely on the language used in these writs, it would be hard to resist a very strange paradox, that the clergy were not only one of the three estates of the realm, but as essential a member of the legislature by their representatives as the commons.[329] They are summoned in the earliest year extant (23 E. I.) ad tractandum, ordinandum et faciendum nobiscum, et cum caeteris praelatis, proceribus, ac aliis incolis regni nostri; in that of the next year, ad ordinandum de quantitate et modo subsidii; in that of the twenty-eighth, ad faciendum et consentiendum his, quae tunc de communi consilio ordinari contigerit. In later times it ran so
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
clergy
 

summoned

 
clause
 

parliament

 
Edward
 

proctors

 

praemunientes

 
faciendum
 

ordinandum

 

twenty


province
 

eighth

 

commons

 

paradox

 

limits

 
judgment
 

resist

 
strange
 
language
 

convocation


dioceses

 

kingdom

 

deputed

 

Carlisle

 

reckoned

 

Canterbury

 

present

 

parliamentary

 

attendance

 

nostri


quantitate
 

incolis

 

praelatis

 
proceribus
 

subsidii

 

contigerit

 

ordinari

 

consilio

 
consentiendum
 
communi

caeteris

 

member

 
legislature
 

representatives

 

essential

 

estates

 

earliest

 

Burton

 

Annals

 

nobiscum