FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217  
218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   >>   >|  
South throw away a great moral advantage when it waged aggressive war upon the North? No doubt it was necessary at first, from the secession point of view, to "fire the Southern heart" by attacking Fort Sumter. And, also from that point of view, that attack was fully justifiable because that fort was in "Confederate" territory. The invasions of Maryland and Pennsylvania were far different, and much more so were the relentless guerrilla war waged in the border States, attended with horrible massacres like that of Lawrence, Kansas, which, though no one charges them to the government or generals of the South, were unavoidable incidents of that species of warfare; and the inhuman cruelties incidentally suffered by Union prisoners. It is true that the slavery question was a very powerful factor in our Civil War, and became more and more so as the war progressed. But opinion on that question at the North was very far from unanimous at the first, and it is a fair and important question how far the growth of sentiment in the free States in favor of emancipation was due to the slaveholders' method of carrying on the war. My desire here is to refer to these questions solely from the military point of view, and for the consideration of military students. The conditions upon which depends success or failure in war are so many,--some of them being more or less obscure,--that careful study of all such conditions is demanded of those who aspire to become military leaders. [( 1) See Thomas's despatch of 8 P. M., November 29, to Colonel H. C. Wharton, Wilson's staff officer: War Records, Vol. XLV, part I, p. 1146.] CHAPTER XIII Grant Orders Thomas to Attack Hood or Relinquish the Command-- Thomas's Corps Commanders Support Him in Delay--Grant's Intentions in Sending Logan to Relieve Thomas--Change of Plan before the Battle of Nashville--The Fighting of December 15--Expectation that Hood would Retreat--Delay in Renewing the Attack on the 16th--Hopelessness of Hood's Position--Letters to Grant and Sherman--Transferred to the East--Financial Burden of the War--Thomas's Attitude toward the War. The perilous character of the situation in Tennessee, in which it was left by Sherman's premature start for the sea and Thomas's tardy concentration of troops, wholly disappeared with the repulse of Hood at Franklin. There was no further obstacle to the concentration of Thomas's forces at Nashville, the organization and equipme
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217  
218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Thomas

 

military

 

question

 

Sherman

 

conditions

 

Attack

 

States

 

Nashville

 

concentration

 

Records


officer

 

Wharton

 

Wilson

 
CHAPTER
 

Franklin

 

Colonel

 
November
 
aspire
 

equipme

 

demanded


obscure

 

careful

 
organization
 

despatch

 

obstacle

 

forces

 

leaders

 

repulse

 

premature

 

Hopelessness


Renewing

 

Retreat

 

Expectation

 

Position

 

Tennessee

 

Financial

 

Attitude

 

Transferred

 

perilous

 

situation


Letters

 

character

 

December

 
Support
 

wholly

 

Intentions

 

Commanders

 

Burden

 
disappeared
 
Relinquish