FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  
ent. Here in a nutshell is the biological basis of sex problem in human society. Human individuals do wear out and have to be replaced by reproduction. In the reproductive process, the female, as in mammals generally, is specialized to provide an intra-maternal environment (approximately nine months in the human species) for each new individual, and lactation or suckling afterward. The biological phase of the sex problem in society consists in studying the nature of that specialization. From the purely sociological standpoint, the sex problem concerns the customs and institutions which have grown up or may grow up to meet the need of society for reproduction. The point which most concerns us is in how far biological data can be applied to the sex problem in society. Systematic dissections or breeding experiments upon human beings, thought out in advance and under control in a laboratory, are subject to obvious limitations. Surgical operations, where careful data are kept, often answer the same purpose as concerns some details; but these alone would give us a fragmentary record of how a fertilized egg becomes a conscious human being of one sex or the other. The practice of medicine often throws light on important points. Observation of abnormal cases plays its part in adding to our knowledge. Carefully compiled records of what does occur in inheritance, while lacking many of the checks of planned and controlled experiments, to some extent take the place of the systematic breeding possible with animals. At best, however, the limitations in experimentation with human subjects would give us a rather disconnected record were it not for the data of experimental biology. How may such biological material be safely used? Indiscriminately employed, it is worse than useless--it can be confusing or actually misleading. It is probably never safe to say, or even to infer directly, that because of this or that animal structure or behaviour we should do thus and so in human society. On this point sociology--especially the sociology of sex--must frankly admit its mistakes and break with much of its cherished past. The social problem of sex consists of fitting the best possible institutions on to the biological foundation _as we find it in the human species_. Hence all our reasoning about which institution or custom is preferable must refer directly to the human bodies which compose society. We can use laboratory evidence about t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

society

 

problem

 

biological

 
concerns
 

breeding

 
institutions
 

consists

 

experiments

 
directly
 
sociology

limitations

 

laboratory

 
record
 
species
 
reproduction
 

material

 

experimental

 

biology

 

safely

 
misleading

confusing

 
useless
 

Indiscriminately

 

employed

 

subjects

 

checks

 
planned
 
controlled
 

extent

 

lacking


inheritance

 

experimentation

 

systematic

 

animals

 

disconnected

 

reasoning

 

foundation

 
fitting
 

cherished

 

social


institution
 

evidence

 
compose
 
bodies
 
custom
 

preferable

 

animal

 
structure
 
behaviour
 

individuals