FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>  
those who are urging it forward. Let the amendment called for be granted, "and all the results indicated in this note," says the writer, "will ultimately be secured;" that is, individuals and corporations will be restrained from violating the Sunday observance. The acknowledgment of God in the Constitution may do very well as a banner under which to sail; but the practical bearing of the movement relates to the compulsory observance of the first day of the week. Even now the question is agitated why the Jew should be allowed to follow his business on the first day after having observed the seventh. The same question is equally pertinent to all seventh-day keepers. A writer signing himself "American," in the Boston _Herald_ of Dec. 14, 1871, said:-- "The President in his late message in speaking of the Mormon question, says, 'They shall not be permitted to break the law under the cloak of religion.' This, undoubtedly, meets the approval of every American citizen, and I wish to cite a parallel case, and ask: Why should the Jews of this country be allowed to keep open their stores on the Sabbath under the cloak of their religion while I, or any other true American, will be arrested and suffer punishment if we do the same thing? If there is a provision made allowing a few to conduct business on the Sabbath, what justice and equality can there be in any such provision, and why should it not be stopped at once?" And this question, we apprehend, will be very summarily decided, when once the Consitutional Amendment has been secured. At a Ministerial Association of the M.E. church held in Healdsburg, Cal., April 26-28, 1870, Rev. Mr. Trefren, of Napa, speaking of S.D.A. ministers, said, "I predict for them a short race. What we want is law in the matter." Then, referring to the present movement for a law, he added, "And we will have it, too; and when we get the power into our hands, we will show these men what their end will be." From a work recently published by the Presbyterian Board of Publication, entitled "The Sabbath," by Chas. Elliott, Professor of Biblical Literature and Exegesis in the Presbyterian Theological Seminary of the North West, Chicago, Ill., we take this paragraph:-- "But it may be asked, Would not the Jew be denied equality of rights by legislation protecting the Christian Sabbath and ignoring the Jewish? The answer is, We are
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>  



Top keywords:
question
 

Sabbath

 

American

 
allowed
 

Presbyterian

 
movement
 

business

 

speaking

 

religion

 

secured


seventh

 
observance
 

provision

 

equality

 

writer

 

Trefren

 

Jewish

 

ministers

 

Amendment

 
Christian

predict

 

ignoring

 
stopped
 

apprehend

 

summarily

 

Healdsburg

 

decided

 
church
 

Association

 
answer

Consitutional

 

Ministerial

 

Elliott

 

Professor

 
denied
 

entitled

 

rights

 
published
 

Publication

 

Biblical


Literature

 
paragraph
 

Chicago

 

Exegesis

 

Theological

 

Seminary

 

recently

 

protecting

 

present

 

referring