FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737  
1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   >>   >|  
ed every opportunity of filling their exchequer; in the case of the king of Egypt, for instance, the decree of the people, which recognized him as legitimate ruler,(10) was sold to him by the coalition at a high price, and in like manner other dynasts and communities acquired charters and privileges on this occasion. Measures Adopted by the Allies for Their Security The permanence of the arrangements made seemed also sufficiently secured. The consulship was, at least for the next year, entrusted to safe hands. The public believed at first, that it was destined for Pompeius and Crassus themselves; the holders of power however preferred to procure the election of two subordinate but trustworth men of their party--Aulus Gabinius, the best among Pompeius' adjutants, and Lucius Piso, who was less important but was Caesar's father-in-law-- as consuls for 696. Pompeius personally undertook to watch over Italy, where at the head of the commission of twenty he prosecuted the execution of the agrarian law and furnished nearly 20,000 burgesses, in great part old soldiers from his army, with land in the territory of Capua. Caesar's north-Italian legions served to back him against the opposition in the capital. There existed no prospect, immediately at least, of a rupture among the holders of power themselves. The laws issued by Caesar as consul, in the maintenance of which Pompeius was at least as much interested as Caesar, formed a guarantee for the continuance of the breach between Pompeius and the aristocracy--whose heads, and Cato in particular, continued to treat these laws as null--and thereby a guarantee for the subsistence of the coalition. Moreover, the personal bonds of connection between its chiefs were drawn closer. Caesar had honestly and faithfully kept his word to his confederates without curtailing or cheating them of what he had promised, and in particular had fought to secure the agrarian law proposed in the interest of Pompeius, just as if the case had been his own, with dexterity and energy; Pompeius was not insensible to upright dealing and good faith, and was kindly disposed towards the man who had helped him to get quit at a blow of the sorry part of a suppliant which he had been playing for three years. Frequent and familiar intercourse with a man of the irresistible amiableness of Caesar did what was farther requisite to convert the alliance of interests into an alliance of friendship. The res
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737  
1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Pompeius
 

Caesar

 

agrarian

 

guarantee

 
holders
 

alliance

 

coalition

 

subsistence

 

chiefs

 

served


personal

 
connection
 
Moreover
 
consul
 
maintenance
 

interested

 

issued

 

prospect

 
immediately
 

rupture


existed
 

closer

 

formed

 

capital

 
continued
 

continuance

 

breach

 

aristocracy

 

opposition

 

playing


suppliant

 

Frequent

 

disposed

 

helped

 

familiar

 

intercourse

 

interests

 

friendship

 
convert
 
requisite

irresistible
 

amiableness

 
farther
 

kindly

 
cheating
 
legions
 
promised
 

fought

 

curtailing

 
faithfully