FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190  
191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   >>   >|  
the great men of antiquity seem to us to have been much more logical than our contemporaries are. How are we to construct a formula for an event? The imperative need of simplification causes us to combine under a single name an enormous mass of minute facts which are perceived in the lump, and between which we vaguely feel that there is a connection (a battle, a war, a reform). The facts which are thus combined are such facts as have conduced to a common result. That is how the common notion of an event arises, and there is no more scientific conception to put in its place. Facts, then, are to be grouped according to their consequences; those which have had no visible consequences disappear, the others are fused into a certain number of aggregates which we call events. In order to describe an event, it is necessary to give precise indications (I) of its character, (2) of its extent. (I) By the character of an event we mean the features which distinguish it from every other event, not merely the external conditions of date and place, but the manner in which it occurred, and its immediate causes. The following are the items of information which the formula should contain. One or more men, in such and such mental states (conceptions, motives of the action), working under such and such material conditions (locality, instrument), performed such and such actions, which had for their result such and such a modification. For the determination of the motives of the actions, the only method is to compare the actions, firstly, with the declarations of those who performed them; secondly, with the interpretation of those who witnessed their performance. There is often a doubt remaining: this is the field of party polemics; every one attributes noble motives to the actions of his own party and discreditable motives to those of the opposite party. But actions described without any indication of motive would be unintelligible. (2) The extension of the event will be indicated both in space (the place where it happened, and the region in which its immediate effects were felt) and in time, the moment when its realisation began, and the moment when the result was brought about. V. Descriptive formulae relating to characters, being merely qualitative, only give an abstract idea of the facts; in order to realise the place they occupied in reality, quantity is necessary. It is not a matter of indifference whether a given usage was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190  
191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

actions

 
motives
 

result

 
moment
 

consequences

 

character

 

common

 

performed

 

formula

 

conditions


modification

 

determination

 
polemics
 

attributes

 

material

 

locality

 
instrument
 

remaining

 
witnessed
 

performance


declarations
 

interpretation

 

compare

 

firstly

 

method

 

characters

 

qualitative

 

abstract

 

relating

 

formulae


brought

 

Descriptive

 

realise

 
indifference
 
matter
 

occupied

 

reality

 
quantity
 

realisation

 

motive


unintelligible

 

extension

 

indication

 

opposite

 

working

 
effects
 

region

 
happened
 

discreditable

 

distinguish