FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151  
152   153   154   >>  
follows immediately from the relative theory of space. Furthermore the inhabitant of Mars determines event-particles by another system of measurements. Call his system the q-system. According to him (q_1, q_2, q_3, q_4) determines an event-particle, and (q_1, q_2, q_3) determines a point and q_4 a time. But the collection of event-particles which he thinks of as a point is entirely different from any such collection which the man on earth thinks of as a point. Thus the q-space for the man on Mars is quite different from the p-space for the land-surveyor on earth. So far in speaking of space we have been talking of the timeless space of physical science, namely, of our concept of eternal space in which the world adventures. But the space which we see as we look about is instantaneous space. Thus if our natural perceptions are adjustable to the p-system of measurements we see instantaneously all the event-particles at some definite time p_4, and observe a succession of such spaces as time moves on. The timeless space is achieved by stringing together all these instantaneous spaces. The points of an instantaneous space are event-particles, and the points of an eternal space are strings of event-particles occurring in succession. But the man on Mars will never perceive the same instantaneous spaces as the man on the earth. This system of instantaneous spaces will cut across the earth-man's system. For the earth-man there is one instantaneous space which is the instantaneous present, there are the past spaces and the future spaces. But the present space of the man on Mars cuts across the present space of the man on the earth. So that of the event-particles which the earth-man thinks of as happening now in the present, the man on Mars thinks that some are already past and are ancient history, that others are in the future, and others are in the immediate present. This break-down in the neat conception of a past, a present, and a future is a serious paradox. I call two event-particles which on some or other system of measurement are in the same instantaneous space 'co-present' event-particles. Then it is possible that A and B may be co-present, and that A and C may be co-present, but that B and C may not be co-present. For example, at some inconceivable distance from us there are events co-present with us now and also co-present with the birth of Queen Victoria. If A and B are co-present there will be some systems in which
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151  
152   153   154   >>  



Top keywords:

present

 

particles

 

instantaneous

 

system

 
spaces
 
thinks
 

future

 

determines

 

timeless

 

succession


points

 

measurements

 

collection

 

eternal

 

history

 

ancient

 

Victoria

 
systems
 

happening

 

events


distance
 
inconceivable
 

measurement

 

conception

 

paradox

 

natural

 

surveyor

 
talking
 

speaking

 

particle


theory

 
relative
 

immediately

 
Furthermore
 

inhabitant

 

According

 
physical
 
science
 

stringing

 

achieved


observe

 

strings

 

perceive

 

occurring

 

definite

 

instantaneously

 
adventures
 

concept

 
adjustable
 

perceptions