FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81  
82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   >>   >|  
htly informed of every fact which tends to decide the question. The trial which forms the subject of the following correspondence was looked forward to with great interest by farmers; such was the partial character of the trial, and the general terms of the committee's report, in which the particulars that led to the result were omitted, it cannot appear strange that the public should be in some degree misled with regard to the relative merits of the two machines. If my own interest was alone concerned, I would not thus far trespass on your columns, but you will doubtless agree with me, that it is due to wheat growers throughout the country that the views expressed by Mr. Roane, in connection with the committee's report, should be published as extensively as the report itself; I therefore solicit the insertion of the following correspondence in your paper. "Very respectfully, "OBED HUSSEY." [Sidenote: Hussey Letter to Mr. Roane] "Baltimore, January 18th, 1844. _"To the Hon. William H. Roane:_ "Dear Sir--You will remember that a trial took place on the farm of Mr. Hutchinson near Richmond, Va., in July last, between my reaping machine and Mr. McCormick's, at which trial you were one of a committee which gave the preference to Mr. McCormick's machine. "You will also recollect that the machine which I used at that time was a small one, and quite different from that which I used in your field a few days afterwards in a second trial between Mr. McCormick and myself. "As the first trial was made under circumstances unfavorable to myself, owing to the difficulties which prevented me from getting my best machine to the field on that day, and other impediments incidental to a stranger unprovided with a team, etc., and as no report was made of the second trial, you will oblige me by informing me what your impressions were after witnessing the second trial. "I would very gladly embrace the opportunity which the next harvest will afford of following up my experiments in wheat cutting in Virginia, but the new field opened to me in the _great west_ for cutting hemp, in which I was so successful last September, as will appear by the Louisville 'Journal' of that date, will claim my particular attention this year. I mention this to you lest it might appear t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81  
82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
report
 

machine

 

committee

 

McCormick

 

cutting

 

interest

 

correspondence

 
reaping
 

difficulties

 
prevented

circumstances

 

preference

 

recollect

 

unfavorable

 

successful

 
September
 

Virginia

 
opened
 

Louisville

 

Journal


mention

 
attention
 

experiments

 

oblige

 

informing

 

unprovided

 

impediments

 
incidental
 

stranger

 

Richmond


impressions
 

opportunity

 
harvest
 

afford

 

embrace

 

gladly

 

witnessing

 

Hussey

 

degree

 

misled


regard

 

relative

 

public

 
omitted
 
strange
 

merits

 
concerned
 

machines

 

result

 

decide