FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>  
tion if I neglected to include some important work which has led some of my fellow-workers to a very different conclusion. [Illustration: FIG. 88. Scheme to show classes of hooded rats used by Castle. (After Castle.)] Castle in particular is the champion of a view based on his results with hooded rats. Starting with individuals which have a narrow black stripe down the back he selected for a narrower stripe in one direction and for a broader stripe in the other. As the diagram shows (fig. 88) Castle has succeeded in producing in one direction a race in which the dorsal stripe has disappeared and in the other direction a race in which the black has extended over the back and sides, leaving only a white mark on the belly. Neither of these extremes occurs, he believes, in the ordinary hooded race of domesticated rats. In other words no matter how many of them came under observation the extreme types of his experiment would not be found. Castle claims that the factor for hoodedness must be a single Mendelian unit, because if hooded rats are crossed to wild gray rats with uniform coat and their offspring are inbred there are produced in F_2 three uniform rats to one hooded rat. Castle advances the hypothesis that factors--by which he means Mendelian factors--may themselves vary in much the same way as do the characters that they stand for. He argues, in so many words, that since we judge a factor by the kind of character it produces, when the character varies the factor that stands for it may have changed. As early as 1903 Cuenot had carried out experiments with spotted mice similar to those of Castle with rats. Cuenot found that spotted crossed to uniform coat color gave in F_2 a ratio of three uniform to one spotted, yet selection of those spotted mice with more white in their coat produced mice in successive generations that had more and more white. Conversely Cuenot showed that selection of those spotted mice that had more color in their coat produced mice with more and more color and less white. Cuenot does not however bring up in this connection the question as to how selection in these spotted mice brings about its results. Without attempting to discuss these results at the length that they deserve let me briefly state why I think Castle's evidence fails to establish his conclusion. In the first place one of the premises may be wrong. The three to one ratio in F_2 by no means proves that all conditions of h
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>  



Top keywords:

Castle

 

spotted

 

hooded

 

Cuenot

 
uniform
 
stripe
 

results

 

factor

 

direction

 

produced


selection

 

Mendelian

 

factors

 

conclusion

 

crossed

 

character

 

carried

 
characters
 

argues

 

produces


changed
 
stands
 

varies

 

evidence

 

briefly

 

length

 

deserve

 
establish
 

proves

 

conditions


premises

 
discuss
 

Conversely

 
showed
 

generations

 

successive

 
similar
 
Without
 

attempting

 

brings


question

 

connection

 

experiments

 

hoodedness

 

individuals

 

narrow

 
Starting
 

champion

 
selected
 

narrower