FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67  
68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   >>   >|  
, had they made an attempt to do so; hence for their own salvation, Christ taught his disciples to pray that their flight might not be on that day, not because it would be wrong to _save their lives_ on that day, which the Sabbatarian view seems to teach." In the first place Christ never intimated a word about _their_ Sabbath; it was THE Sabbath, the same that he had kept. Your sophistical argument about their flight, &c. &c. touches not the main point. Christ did here recognize THE Sabbath of the Lord thirty-five years beyond the time which you say it was abolished. At that time, if it never did before, as you have it, it belonged as much to the Gentile as the Jew, unless you make another attempt to stretch out the Jewish dispensation thirty-five years to cover it. His disciples certainly kept the Sabbath, the day after his death, and you cannot prove by the scriptures that the disciples ever held a meeting but once of an evening on the first day. Therefore you must be very much pushed for a Sabbath, to continually call that day one, as you do, at the same time reiterating, "_we want none of your inferences!_" Luke also recognizes THE Sabbath twenty years beyond the resurrection, and shows that Paul kept it, and the Gentiles also.--Acts xiii: 42, 44. You attempt to destroy all this proof too, because you say this was the Jews' day for worship, and Paul could get a better hearing. Don't you see that the Gentiles invited him to preach to them--they kept the same day, 44th verse. See xvi: 13; here they are by the river's side. Paul's manner was to reason with them on the Sabbath; see xvii: 2, and xviii: 4, 11. So was it the custom of the Saviour; Mark vi: 2, and Luke iv: 16, 31. Now if all this is not _New Testament_ evidence enough for _honest_ believers, in the absence of any other testimony for an abolition, or change of the Sabbath, then it is because men would rather pervert the word of God than keep it. God's Code of Laws in the New Testament. "Why do ye transgress the commandments of God."--Matthew xv: 3. "What is written in the law, how readest thou?"--Luke x: 26. "Even as I have kept my Father's commandments."--John xv: 10. "Yea, we establish the law."--Rom. iii: 31. "The law is holy and the commandment is holy."--Rom. vii: 12. "Not subject to the law of God."--Rom. viii: 7, also xiii: 8-10. "But the commandments of God."--1st Cor. vii: 19; 1st Tim. i: 8. "For whoever shall keep the whole
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67  
68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Sabbath

 

Christ

 
attempt
 

disciples

 

commandments

 

thirty

 

Gentiles

 
Testament
 

flight

 

manner


honest

 

evidence

 

testimony

 
believers
 
absence
 

Saviour

 

reason

 
abolition
 

custom

 

commandment


subject
 

Father

 
establish
 

pervert

 

change

 

transgress

 

Matthew

 

readest

 

written

 
twenty

belonged

 

Gentile

 

abolished

 
recognize
 

dispensation

 
stretch
 
Jewish
 

touches

 

argument

 
taught

salvation

 
Sabbatarian
 
intimated
 

sophistical

 

worship

 

destroy

 

preach

 
invited
 
hearing
 

resurrection