FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   >>  
to the feed water line. A number of possibilities could be mentioned, all speculative. However, there was no doubt that this equipment could be properly installed in the reconstructed hull, either on the lower deck or in the hold. Two questions have been raised as to machinery arrangement--whether the engine, and boilers also, might have been forward of the wheel shaft, and whether the wheel shaft was above or below deck. If the engine were placed forward of the wheel shaft, the wheels might be farther aft than is proposed in the reconstruction. However, the smokestack could not then be forward of the wheel shaft as shown by Marestier because it would have had to pass through the engine frame, thus interfering with the movement of the large crosshead. If the engine were abaft the wheel shaft, the stack could have been only as shown by Marestier. The boilers might then have been forward of the wheel shaft only if the stack were at the end away from the firebox. However, the length of the boilers as indicated by the Russian description would then have required them to pass through the bows! Models have been built of the _Savannah_ in which the engine and boilers are forward of the paddle wheel shaft, and the shaft below the main deck. This was accomplished by placing the engine off center so that the stack came through the decks alongside it. This is an impractical arrangement because it would have created an impossible ballasting problem. The weight of the engine, to port in the models, would have to have been counteracted by ballast to starboard. Due to the coal bunkers, and the possibility of two boilers below the engine in the hold, there would not have been room for sufficient ballast. In addition, were such ballasting possible, the combined weights were too far forward to give proper trim, and a great deal more ballast would have been required far aft, a most impractical proceeding. The position of the wheel shaft was determined as described earlier. The ship was apparently well-advanced in construction at the time of purchase. Her clamps and shelves supporting her upper deck beams, which then would have been in place, were important strength members. In reconstructing, to place the wheel shaft below these members would not only bring the engine nearly level--it is described and shown inclined by Marestier--but also would immerse the paddle blades too deeply for the draft and depth of the hull. To place the sha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   >>  



Top keywords:

engine

 

forward

 

boilers

 

Marestier

 

ballast

 

However

 

ballasting

 

required

 

impractical

 

paddle


members

 

arrangement

 
proper
 

addition

 

bunkers

 
starboard
 

counteracted

 

models

 

possibility

 
combined

weights

 

sufficient

 

construction

 

reconstructing

 
important
 

strength

 

inclined

 
deeply
 

immerse

 

blades


earlier

 

apparently

 
determined
 

position

 

proceeding

 

advanced

 

clamps

 
shelves
 
supporting
 

purchase


weight

 

raised

 

machinery

 

questions

 

wheels

 

smokestack

 

reconstruction

 
proposed
 

farther

 

reconstructed