FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271  
272   >>  
ready to rise against us. Every indication of our desire to avoid hostilities was interpreted as a sign of weakness, and thus became an incentive to the renewal of the struggle. Another reason for the fresh outbreak of war was the treachery of the native princes. I cannot say that in the matter of treaty keeping we had clean hands. The gross deceit played on Omichund, as described by Macaulay in his Essay on Lord Clive, stands nearly alone in our public conduct in India, but other transactions have been unworthy of our character for high-minded integrity. It may, however, be confidently affirmed, that looking at our governing conduct as a whole, it presents by its faithfulness to engagements a marked contrast to the conduct of those who had entered into treaty with us. Many of our Indian wars would have been prevented had there not been on their part the violation of engagements in a manner which showed they never intended to keep them an hour longer than they were compelled by circumstances. If a review of the course pursued by our people in India shows how we became the governing power, and indicates the ground on which our rule rests, a review of the history of India for ages previous to our advent, and of the condition in which we found it, will help us greatly in answering the question--Has India been benefited or injured by our having seized the sceptre? [Sidenote: MUHAMMADAN RULE.] For centuries Muhammadans were the rulers of India. They entered, not to avenge wrongs done to them, but as the servants of Allah, called to put down idolatry, and entitled to rule over the nations they subdued. Centuries elapsed before the extension of their rule beyond the North-West region. Gradually it extended to other parts of India. The seventeenth century was well advanced before the greater part of Southern India came under the rule of the Emperor of Delhi--the Shah-un-shah, King of kings, as he was called. His suzerainty was generally acknowledged in those lands which continued under Hindu rulers. As we turn over page after page of the Muhammadan rule in India, what scenes of strife, of bloody war, of treachery, of desolated countries, continually meet our view! No sooner did an emperor die than the struggle commenced for the vacant throne between his many sons, brother fighting with brother till one became the victor, and then woe to the vanquished! The governors of Provinces, as soon as they thought they had suffi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271  
272   >>  



Top keywords:
conduct
 

engagements

 

treaty

 

governing

 

rulers

 

struggle

 

brother

 
called
 

review

 
entered

treachery

 

benefited

 

Gradually

 

seventeenth

 

century

 
extended
 

region

 
nations
 

wrongs

 

servants


Sidenote

 
avenge
 

MUHAMMADAN

 

Muhammadans

 

subdued

 

Centuries

 

elapsed

 
injured
 

centuries

 

sceptre


idolatry
 

entitled

 
seized
 

extension

 

acknowledged

 

commenced

 

vacant

 

throne

 

emperor

 

continually


sooner

 

Provinces

 

governors

 
thought
 
vanquished
 

fighting

 
victor
 

countries

 

desolated

 

Southern