FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424  
425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   >>   >|  
re him on his wonderful etching of the "Tail of a Comet;" still, he was unable to impart to his pupil's work either trained ease or style. Cruikshank was on terms of intimacy with Mark Lemon, but he never drew for _Punch_, save indirectly for its advertisement page in 1844--an announcement for his "Table-Book," in which appear the portraits of Gilbert Abbott a Beckett (his literary Editor), Thackeray, and himself. Yet the "Quarterly Review," in the course of an essay upon that journal, declared that "_Punch_ owes at least half its popularity to the pencil of George Cruikshank"! The fact is, that Cruikshank, though on intimate terms with many of the Staff, would never allow himself to be persuaded to draw for its pages. "We shall have you yet," said Mark Lemon one day. "Never," said Cruikshank, in his most melodramatic tone and striking his favourite attitude. He had then become the staunchest of total abstainers, and he held its very name in abhorrence. Moreover, he professed to look upon their Dinners as orgies; but it is far more likely that the predominance in its pages and in its councils of his mighty rival, John Leech, had more to do with his total abstinence--from _Punch_, I mean--than any other consideration. "Between Cruikshank and Leech," says Mr. Frith, "there existed little sympathy and less intimacy. The extravagant caricature that pervades so much of Cruikshank's work, and from which Leech was entirely free, blinded him a little to the great merit of Cruikshank's serious work. I was very intimate with 'Immortal George,' as he was familiarly called, and I was much surprised by the coolness with which he received my enthusiastic praise of Leech. 'Yes, yes,' said George, 'very clever. The new school, you see. Public always taken with novelty.'" Nevertheless, it must not be forgotten that the only lessons in etching Leech ever had he received from George Cruikshank. Moreover, George had a grievance, as will be seen by the following letter addressed to Mr. G. H. Haydon, one of _Punch's_ subsequent contributors, to whom reference will be made later on:-- "263, Hampstead Road, N.W., January 7, 1867. "MY DEAR SIR, "I am sorry that I am not able to tell you where to find a 'Punch and Judy,' but I think some of that family reside, or might be heard of, in the vicinity of Leicester Square. The 'Punch' that I copied
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424  
425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cruikshank

 

George

 

intimate

 
received
 

Moreover

 

intimacy

 

etching

 

praise

 

clever

 
enthusiastic

coolness

 
copied
 
Square
 

school

 
novelty
 

vicinity

 

Nevertheless

 

Public

 
Leicester
 
surprised

extravagant

 
caricature
 

pervades

 

sympathy

 
existed
 

Immortal

 

familiarly

 
called
 

blinded

 

wonderful


forgotten

 

January

 

Hampstead

 

family

 

reside

 

grievance

 

lessons

 

letter

 

contributors

 

reference


subsequent

 

Haydon

 
addressed
 

consideration

 

indirectly

 

advertisement

 

pencil

 
persuaded
 

popularity

 

Editor