FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184  
185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   >>   >|  
short time I said-- "'Oh, sire, it is quite clear. The political European position is here represented by a whist party, and your Majesty is represented apparently as hesitating whether to continue the game.' "It was a perplexing question, and I felt very much as Daniel may have felt when called upon to explain 'Nebuchadnezzar's dream!'" I was suggesting just now that to Cabinet Ministers the attitude of _Punch_ is often a matter of very real concern--at least, that they seem usually to have attached more importance to the matter than we who stand outside would think to be reasonable; though, from a proper sense of the ridiculous doubtless, Ministers have rarely turned upon _Punch_ to rend him, for all they may have suffered at his hands. There is a pretty story of Lord John Russell that is at once a charming proof to the statesman's magnanimity and of the paper's influence. When the excitement, already referred to, of the so-called "Papal Aggression" was at its height, in consequence of the action of the Pope in creating Roman Catholic Archbishops and Bishops with English territorial titles, Lord John, who was then in power, took an active part in the House of Commons on the side of the scaremongers, by introducing the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill--in respect to which he was strenuously opposed by both Bright and Cobden--not in order to put repressive measures into force against the Catholics, he assured the House, but simply "to insist upon our ascendency." Or, as he explained in 1874, "The object of that Bill was merely to _assert_ the supremacy of the Crown. It was never intended to prosecute. Accordingly, a very clever artist represented me, in a caricature, as a boy who had chalked up 'No Popery' upon a wall[17] and then ran away. This was a very fair joke.... When my object had been gained, I had no objection to the repeal of the Bill." This gave Leech his chance, and he executed his famous cartoon of 'No Popery!' (March 22nd, 1851), which was among the greatest popular successes ever published by _Punch_--even his smart young rival, the "Man in the Moon," declaring that _Punch_ had with his cut "wakened up those whom his letterpress had sent to sleep." In his Reminiscences the Rev. William Rogers, Rector of St. Botolph's, Bishopsgate, tells the delightful sequel. When he called on Lord John, the Minister began to talk about the Charterhouse. "He said that he had lost his interest in the latter since his
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184  
185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

called

 

represented

 

object

 

Popery

 

Ministers

 

matter

 
chalked
 

intended

 

clever

 

prosecute


artist
 

Accordingly

 

caricature

 

gained

 

assert

 

measures

 

Catholics

 

repressive

 
Bright
 

Cobden


assured

 
objection
 

supremacy

 

explained

 

simply

 
insist
 

ascendency

 
Rector
 

Rogers

 

Botolph


Bishopsgate

 

William

 

letterpress

 

Reminiscences

 

delightful

 

interest

 

Charterhouse

 
sequel
 

Minister

 

greatest


cartoon
 
famous
 

chance

 
executed
 
popular
 
successes
 

declaring

 

wakened

 

published

 

repeal