FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >>  
s, by Wm. Lloyd in September, 1887. Later, Allen wrote (Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 5:200, August 18, 1893) that a series of moles from Rockport, Aransas County, Texas, agreed essentially with the type. True (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 19:22, December 21, 1896) believed that the type was actually from Aransas County rather than Presidio County. This belief was shared by later workers. In checking the literature, I find that the collector of the type, Wm. Lloyd, who was obtaining specimens for George B. Sennett at the time, took other mammals in September as well as in October of 1887 in Presidio County (see Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 3:221, 223, 224, April 29, 1891) and birds there in June of 1887 (see Sennett, Auk, 5:43, January, 1888). I can find no evidence that Lloyd collected in or near Aransas County in 1887 and see no reason for doubting that the locality, Presidio County, as written on the original label of the type of _S. a. texanus_ is correct. Mr. M. J. Carroll of the Texas State Historical Association advises me that in 1887, Presidio County was reduced to its present size by the creation of Brewster and Jeff Davis counties. Lloyd might have taken the mole in any one of these three Trans-Pecos counties. Even so, these counties are widely separated geographically from the range of other moles designated as _S. a. texanus_ (see Davis, Amer. Midl. Nat., 27:386, March, 1942). The taking of _S. montanus_ in the Sierra del Carmen immediately south of Trans-Pecos Texas leads me to think that Lloyd's mole might have been taken in a mountainous region within one of the three counties mentioned above. A description of _Scalopus aquaticus texanus_ Allen follows: =Scalopus aquaticus texanus= Allen _Scalops argentatus texanus_ Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 3:221, April 29, 1891. _Type._--Sex unknown, adult, skin no. 3488, skull no. 2740, Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.; Presidio County, Texas; September, 1887, obtained by Wm. Lloyd. _Range._--Limits of range in Trans-Pecos Texas unknown. _Diagnosis._--Size small; rostrum heavy and broad; lower jaws heavy; palatine space wide with upper tooth-rows arched laterally; teeth large, especially fourth premolar and molars. _Comparison._--From adults of comparable age from Rockport, Aransas County, Texas, _S. a. texanus_ differs in: Rostrum broader and heavier; lower jaws heavier; palatine s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >>  



Top keywords:
County
 

texanus

 

Presidio

 

Aransas

 

counties

 
September
 
palatine
 

Sennett

 

unknown

 

Rockport


heavier

 
Scalopus
 

aquaticus

 

mountainous

 

region

 

geographically

 

mentioned

 

designated

 

separated

 

widely


Sierra
 

Carmen

 

montanus

 
taking
 
immediately
 
obtained
 
fourth
 

laterally

 

arched

 

premolar


molars

 
differs
 

Rostrum

 

broader

 

comparable

 
Comparison
 

adults

 

argentatus

 

Scalops

 
description

rostrum

 

Diagnosis

 

Limits

 
workers
 

checking

 

literature

 

shared

 

belief

 

collector

 
mammals