FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>  
real currents. That, I venture to say, is still a mystery. It almost seems as if some of the masters of aerial navigation in the bird world were gifted with the ability to propel themselves forward by a mere act of volition. An interesting article on the subject of bird flight appeared not long ago in one of the foremost periodicals of the country, a part of which is here quoted to show what a puzzling problem we have before us: Recent developments in aerial navigation have renewed interest in the comparative study of the mechanical principles involved in the flying of birds. There is one exceedingly puzzling law in regard to birds and all flying creatures, the solution of which may work far-reaching influences in the construction of flying craft. "This law, which has thus far perplexed scientists, is that the heavier and bigger the bird or insect, the less relative wing area is required for its support. Thus the area of wing surface of a gnat is forty-nine units of area to every one of weight. In graphic contrast to that, a condor (_Sarcorhamphus gryphus_) which weighed 16.52 pounds had a wing surface of 9.80 square feet. In other words, though the gnat needs wing surface in a ratio of forty-nine square feet per pound of weight, a great condor manages to sail along majestically with .59 of a square foot to at least a pound of weight. The unexplained phenomenon persists consistently throughout the whole domain of entomology and ornithology. Going up the scale from the gnat, it is found that with the dragon fly this ratio is 30 to 1, with the _tipula_, or daddy-longlegs, 14.5 to 1, the cockchafer only 5.15 to 1, the rhinoceros beetle 3.14 to 1. "Among birds the paradoxical law that the smaller the creature the bigger the relative supporting wings holds good. A screech owl (_Scops zorca_) weighing one-third of a pound had 2.35 square feet of wing surface per pound of weight. A fish hawk (_Pandion haliaetus_) weighing nearly three pounds had a wing area of 1.08 square feet to each pound. A turkey buzzard weighing 5.6 pounds had a little less than one square foot of wing surface to each pound. A griffon vulture (_Gyps fulvus_) weighing 16.52 pounds had a wing surface of only .68 square feet to the pound. "Students of aerial navigation who are devoting much attention to observations of birds say that if the peculiar law governing extant flying creatures could be fathomed the problem of human flight might
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>  



Top keywords:

square

 

surface

 

weight

 

weighing

 

pounds

 

flying

 

aerial

 

navigation

 
creatures
 

problem


bigger
 

puzzling

 

relative

 
flight
 

condor

 
ornithology
 
tipula
 

domain

 

entomology

 

majestically


phenomenon

 

unexplained

 
persists
 

consistently

 
dragon
 

paradoxical

 

fulvus

 

Students

 
vulture
 

griffon


buzzard

 

turkey

 

devoting

 

fathomed

 

extant

 

governing

 

attention

 

observations

 
peculiar
 
creature

smaller

 

supporting

 

manages

 

cockchafer

 

rhinoceros

 

beetle

 

screech

 

Pandion

 

haliaetus

 

longlegs