FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
>>  
uncing it as the work of "some fellow who assumed his name," because here is evidence that a person of the same name (if not Sir George himself, as Mr. Corser thinks) was living at the period. The name, if _assumed_ in the case of the _Great Plantagenet_, would hardly have been kept up in the publications just alluded to. In the British Museum, among the Cotton MSS. (_Tiberius_, E. X.), is preserved a MS. called "The history of King Richard the Third, comprised in five books, gathered and written by Sir G. Buc, Knight, Master of the King's Office of the Revels, and one of the gentlemen of his Majesty's Privy Chamber." This MS., which appears to have been the author's rough draft, is corrected by interlineations and erasements in every page. It is much injured by fire, but a part of the dedication to Sir Thomas Howard, the Earl of Arundel, &c., still remains, together with "an advertisement to the reader," which is dated "from the King's Office of the Revels, St. Peter's Hill, 1619." This _history_ was first published in 1646, by George Buck, _Esquire_, who says, in his dedication to Philip, the Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, "that he had _collected these papers out of their dust_." Here is evidence that the work was not _published_ by the original compiler; besides, how can Mr. Corser reconcile his author's knighthood with the designations on the respective title-pages of _The Great Plantagenet_, and _The History of Richard the Third_? In the former the writer is styled "George Buck, _Esquire_," and in the latter, "George Buck, _Gentleman_." It is difficult to account for Mr. Corser's omission of these facts, because I am well assured, that, with his extensive knowledge of our earlier poets, my information is not new to him. That there were _two_ George Bucs in the seventeenth century, and both of them poets, cannot, I think, be doubted. Perhaps they were not even relations; at any rate, Mr. Corser's account of the parentage of _one_ differs from mine entirely. "He [Sir George Buc] was born at Ely, the eldest son of Robert Bucke, and Elizabeth, the daughter of Peter Lee of Brandon Ferry; the grandson of Robert Bucke, and Jane, the daughter of Clement Higham; the great-grandson of Sir John Bucke, who, having helped Richard to a horse on Bosworth Field, was attainted for his zeal."--Chalmers' _Apology_, p. 488. The MS. now in Mr. Corser's possession occurs in the _Bibliotheca Heberiana_, P
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
>>  



Top keywords:
George
 
Corser
 

Richard

 

history

 

Office

 

Revels

 

author

 

published

 

Robert

 
grandson

daughter
 

account

 

dedication

 

Esquire

 

assumed

 
Plantagenet
 

evidence

 

History

 
seventeenth
 

doubted


respective

 

century

 

assured

 

Gentleman

 
omission
 

extensive

 

knowledge

 

fellow

 

information

 

writer


styled
 
earlier
 
Perhaps
 

difficult

 

Bosworth

 
attainted
 

helped

 

Chalmers

 

Apology

 
Bibliotheca

Heberiana

 
occurs
 

possession

 

Higham

 

Clement

 
differs
 
parentage
 
relations
 

eldest

 
uncing