FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  
I have taken a great deal of pains about your _salicaria_ and mine, with a white stroke over its eye and a tawny rump. I have surveyed it alive and dead, and have procured several specimens, and am perfectly persuaded myself (and trust you will soon become convinced of the same) that it is no more nor less than the _passer arundinaceus minor_ of Ray. This bird, by some means or other, seems to be entirely omitted in the British Zoology; and one reason probably was because it is so strangely classed in Ray, who ranges it among his _picis affines_. It ought, no doubt, to have gone among his _aviculae cauda unicolore_, and among your slender-billed small birds of the same division. Linnaeus might with great propriety have put it into his genus of _motacilla_; and _motacilla salicaria_ of his _fauna suecica_ seems to come the nearest to it. It is no uncommon bird, haunting the sides of ponds and rivers where there is covert, and the reeds and sedges of moors. The country people in some places call it the sedge-bird. It sings incessantly night and day during the breeding-time, imitating the note of a sparrow, a swallow, a skylark, and has a strange hurrying manner in its song. My specimens correspond most minutely to the description of your _fen salicaria_ shot near Revesby. Mr. Ray has given an excellent characteristic of it when he says, "_Rostrum et pedes in hac avicula multo majores sunt quam pro corporis ratione_." See letter, May 29th, 1769. (Preceding letter xxiv.) I have got you the egg of an _oedicnemus_, or stone-curlew, which was picked up in a fallow on the naked ground. There were two, but the finder inadvertently crushed one with his foot before he saw them. When I wrote to you last year on reptiles, I wish I had not forgot to mention the faculty that snakes have of stinking _se defendendo_. I knew a gentleman who kept a tame snake, which was in its person as sweet as any animal while in good humour and unalarmed, but as soon as a stranger, or a dog or cat, came in, it fell to hissing, and filled the room with such nauseous effluvia as rendered it hardly supportable. Thus the squnck, or stonck, of Ray's "Synop. Quadr." is an innocuous and sweet animal; but, when pressed hard by dogs and men, it can eject such a most pestilent and fetid smell and excrement, that nothing can be more horrible. A gentleman sent me lately a fine specimen of the _lanius minor cinerascens cum macula in scapulis alba
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
salicaria
 

gentleman

 

motacilla

 

animal

 
specimens
 
letter
 

crushed

 
finder
 

inadvertently

 

faculty


forgot

 

avicula

 
reptiles
 

mention

 
ground
 
ratione
 

corporis

 

oedicnemus

 
Preceding
 

curlew


majores

 

fallow

 

snakes

 
picked
 

scapulis

 
stonck
 

innocuous

 

squnck

 

supportable

 

cinerascens


lanius

 

specimen

 
pestilent
 

excrement

 

pressed

 

rendered

 
horrible
 
humour
 

person

 

defendendo


unalarmed

 

macula

 

filled

 

hissing

 
nauseous
 

effluvia

 
stranger
 

stinking

 
strange
 

reason