FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  
I have taken a great deal of pains about your _salicaria_ and mine, with a white stroke over its eye and a tawny rump. I have surveyed it alive and dead, and have procured several specimens, and am perfectly persuaded myself (and trust you will soon become convinced of the same) that it is no more nor less than the _passer arundinaceus minor_ of Ray. This bird, by some means or other, seems to be entirely omitted in the British Zoology; and one reason probably was because it is so strangely classed in Ray, who ranges it among his _picis affines_. It ought, no doubt, to have gone among his _aviculae cauda unicolore_, and among your slender-billed small birds of the same division. Linnaeus might with great propriety have put it into his genus of _motacilla_; and _motacilla salicaria_ of his _fauna suecica_ seems to come the nearest to it. It is no uncommon bird, haunting the sides of ponds and rivers where there is covert, and the reeds and sedges of moors. The country people in some places call it the sedge-bird. It sings incessantly night and day during the breeding-time, imitating the note of a sparrow, a swallow, a skylark, and has a strange hurrying manner in its song. My specimens correspond most minutely to the description of your _fen salicaria_ shot near Revesby. Mr. Ray has given an excellent characteristic of it when he says, "_Rostrum et pedes in hac avicula multo majores sunt quam pro corporis ratione_." See letter, May 29th, 1769. (Preceding letter xxiv.) I have got you the egg of an _oedicnemus_, or stone-curlew, which was picked up in a fallow on the naked ground. There were two, but the finder inadvertently crushed one with his foot before he saw them. When I wrote to you last year on reptiles, I wish I had not forgot to mention the faculty that snakes have of stinking _se defendendo_. I knew a gentleman who kept a tame snake, which was in its person as sweet as any animal while in good humour and unalarmed, but as soon as a stranger, or a dog or cat, came in, it fell to hissing, and filled the room with such nauseous effluvia as rendered it hardly supportable. Thus the squnck, or stonck, of Ray's "Synop. Quadr." is an innocuous and sweet animal; but, when pressed hard by dogs and men, it can eject such a most pestilent and fetid smell and excrement, that nothing can be more horrible. A gentleman sent me lately a fine specimen of the _lanius minor cinerascens cum macula in scapulis alba
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
salicaria
 

gentleman

 

motacilla

 

animal

 

specimens

 
letter
 
crushed
 

finder

 

inadvertently

 
faculty

forgot

 

avicula

 
reptiles
 

mention

 

ground

 
ratione
 

corporis

 
oedicnemus
 

Preceding

 
curlew

majores

 

fallow

 

snakes

 
picked
 
scapulis
 

stonck

 

innocuous

 
squnck
 
supportable
 

cinerascens


lanius

 
specimen
 

pestilent

 

excrement

 
pressed
 

rendered

 

horrible

 

humour

 

person

 
defendendo

unalarmed

 
macula
 

filled

 

hissing

 

nauseous

 

effluvia

 

stranger

 

stinking

 

strange

 
reason