FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113  
114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>  
me support was at first given to this chemical theory by the bleaching action of light on the visual purple present in the retina, but it has been found that the presence or absence of visual purple could not be essential to vision, and that its function, when present, is of only secondary importance. For it is well known that in the most sensitive portion of the human retina, the _fovea centralis_, the visual purple is wanting; it is also found to be completely absent from the retinae of many animals possessing keen sight. #(2) Electrical theory.#--The second, or electrical, theory supposes that the visual impulse is the concomitant of an electrical impulse; that an electrical current is generated in the retina under the incidence of light, and that this is transmitted to the brain by the optic nerve. There is much to be said in favour of this view, for it is an undoubted fact, that light gives rise to retinal currents, and that, conversely, an electrical current suitably applied causes the sensation of light. #Retinal currents.#--Holmgren, Dewar, McKendrick, Kuhne, Steiner, and others have shown that illumination produces electric variation in a freshly excised eye. About this general fact of the electrical response there is a widespread agreement, but there is some difference of opinion as regards the sign of this response immediately on the application, cessation, and during the continuance of light. These slight discrepancies may be partly due to the unsatisfactory nomenclature--as regards use of terms _positive_ and _negative_--hitherto in vogue and partly also to the differing states of the excised eyes observed. Waller, in his excellent and detailed work on the retinal currents of the frog, has shown how the sign of response is reversed in the moribund condition of the eye. As to the confusion arising from our present terminology, we must remember that the term _positive_ or _negative_ is used with regard to a current of reference--the so-called current of injury. [Illustration: FIG. 95. RETINAL RESPONSE TO LIGHT The current of response is from the nerve to the retina.] When the two galvanometric contacts are made, one with the cut end of the nerve, and the other on the uninjured cornea, a current of injury is found which _in the eye_ is from the nerve to the retina. In the normal freshly excised eye, the current of response due to the action of light on the retina is always from the nerve, which is n
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113  
114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>  



Top keywords:

current

 

retina

 

electrical

 

response

 

visual

 

present

 

purple

 

excised

 
theory
 

currents


retinal

 

negative

 

positive

 

partly

 

impulse

 

injury

 

freshly

 
action
 

excellent

 

observed


states
 

Waller

 

differing

 

hitherto

 

cessation

 

opinion

 

application

 

detailed

 

difference

 

immediately


continuance

 

nomenclature

 

unsatisfactory

 
slight
 

discrepancies

 
galvanometric
 

contacts

 

RETINAL

 

RESPONSE

 

normal


cornea

 
uninjured
 
confusion
 
arising
 

condition

 

moribund

 
reversed
 

terminology

 

reference

 

called