FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>   >|  
ht to use in corroboration of those above quoted. We refer to John vi. 53-56: _"Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink His blood, you have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternal life ... for my flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood dwelleth in me, and I in him."_ As it is a disputed point, however, whether this passage refers to the Lord's Supper or not, we are willing to waive it here. We are content to take those passages quoted above, which every one acknowledges as referring directly to our subject. These we would have the reader carefully examine. Note particularly the language, the words employed. In the four accounts given of the institution, three by the Evangelists and one by Paul, we have the same clear, plain words concerning the bread and wine--words of the last will and testament of the Son of God, our Saviour--"_This is my body." "This is my blood of the New Testament_;" or "_the New Testament in my blood_." Note the language of Paul: _"Guilty of the body and blood of the Lord." "Not discerning the Lord's body."_ The cup is called _the communion of the blood_, and the bread, _the communion of the body_ of Christ. The word communion is made up of two Latin words, _con_ and _unio_, meaning union with, or connection with. The marginal reading in our family Bibles, as well as in the revised version, is "participation in." The plain English of the verse then is, the bread is a participation in, or a connection with Christ's body, and the wine with His blood. We are now ready to take all these passages together, to compare them one with another, and to ask, What do they teach? What is the Bible doctrine of the Lord's Supper? Is it transubstantiation? Is it consubstantiation? Is it that the bread and wine are mere representations or memorials of the absent body and blood of Christ? Or do these passages teach "That the body and blood of Christ are truly present under the form of bread and wine and are communicated to those that eat in the Lord's Supper?" (Augsburg Confession, Art. X.) CHAPTER XV. THE LORD'S SUPPER--CONCLUDED. We have quoted, noted, collected and compared the words of Scripture that speak of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper. We now wish to ask and examine the question: What do thes
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Christ
 

Supper

 

quoted

 
passages
 

communion

 

participation

 

language

 

examine

 
Testament
 
connection

drinketh

 

eateth

 

reading

 

meaning

 

revised

 

version

 

Bibles

 

family

 

marginal

 
English

doctrine
 

CHAPTER

 
Confession
 

communicated

 

Augsburg

 

sacrament

 

collected

 
compared
 
Scripture
 

CONCLUDED


SUPPER
 

present

 

question

 

compare

 

transubstantiation

 

absent

 

memorials

 

consubstantiation

 

representations

 

institution


dwelleth

 

eternal

 

disputed

 
passage
 

refers

 

corroboration

 

Verily

 

Except

 

verily

 

Evangelists