FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>  
uld, for this single virtue, prefer her influence to Apollo and the Nine Muses. Is there no bastard virtue in the peace of which the poet makes her the author?--'The goddess bade Britannia sleep.' Is she not celebrated for her beauty, another bastard virtue?--'Fate this _fair_ idol gave.' One bastard virtue the poet hath given her; which, with these sort of critics, might make her pass for a wit; and that is, her love of a joke--'For gentle Dulness ever loved a joke.' Her delight in games and races is another of her bastard virtues, which would captivate her nobler sons, and draw them to her shrine; not to speak of her indulgence to young travellers, whom she accompanies as Minerva did Telemachus. But of all her bastard virtues, her FREE-THINKING, the virtue which she anxiously propagates amongst her followers in the Fourth Book, might, one would think, have been sufficient to have covered the poet from this censure. But had Mr Pope drawn her without the least disguise, it had not signified a rush. Disguised or undisguised, the poem had been neither better nor worse, and he has secured it from being rejected as unnatural by ten thousand beauties of nature." This is too Warburtonian--and Lord Kames must be answered after another fashion, by Christopher North. What would his lordship have? That she should be called by some other more specious name? By that of some quality to which writers and other men do aspire, and under the semblance of which Dulness is actually found to mask itself--as Gravity, Dignity, Solemnity? Why, two losses would thus be incurred. First, the whole mirth of the poem, or the greater part of it, would be gone. Secondly, the comprehensiveness of the present name would be forfeited, and a more partial quality taken. The vigour and strength of the fiction requires exactly what Pope has done--the barefaced acceptance of Dulness as the imperial power. The poet acts, in fact, under a logical necessity. She is really the goddess under whose influence and virtue they, her subjects, live; whose inspiration sustains and governs their actions. But it would be against all manners that a goddess should not be known and worshipped under her own authentic denomination. To cheat her followers out of their worship, by showing herself to them under a diversity of false appearances, would have been unworthy of her divinity. As to the probability of the fiction, the answer is plain and ready. Nobody asks for prob
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>  



Top keywords:

virtue

 

bastard

 

goddess

 

Dulness

 

virtues

 

influence

 

followers

 

fiction

 
quality
 
comprehensiveness

greater

 

incurred

 
Secondly
 

semblance

 

specious

 

writers

 

called

 
lordship
 

aspire

 
Dignity

Solemnity

 
Gravity
 

present

 

losses

 

worship

 

showing

 

denomination

 

manners

 

worshipped

 

authentic


diversity
 

Nobody

 
answer
 

probability

 

appearances

 

unworthy

 

divinity

 

actions

 

barefaced

 

acceptance


imperial

 

requires

 

partial

 

vigour

 

strength

 

Christopher

 
subjects
 

inspiration

 

sustains

 

governs