FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508  
509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   >>   >|  
sted by an opportunity to read a manuscript of Judge Hough's concerning them. The case of the _Virgen del Rosario_, more exactly the cases of Richard Haddon _v._ 10 Doubloons, etc., of Ybanez _v._ L2409, and of the King _v._ Thomas Miller and Sampson Simpson, give excellent illustrations of the chicanery with which prize cases could be conducted and of the manner in which through admiralty courts the ends of justice could be defeated. The materials are copious. The history of the capture is sufficiently set forth in docs. no. 187 and no. 188. The legal history of the case may be summarized as follows. Sept. 20, 1756, Nathaniel Marston and Jasper Farmar petition governor and council for a privateer's commission for the _Peggy_ or _Charming Peggy_, whereof Richard Haddon was to be commander, Christopher Miller lieutenant; _Cal. N.Y. Hist. MSS._, II. 659. Sept. 29, 1756, the commission is granted. Dec. 7, 1756, the _Peggy_ captures the schooner _La Virgen del Rosario y el Santo Christo de Buen Viage_, plunders her, and lets her go. (It will be remembered that Great Britain was not at war with Spain at this time, but only with France.) Mar. 5, 1757, the _Peggy_ arrives at New York, "having taken as many Prizes during her Cruize as she could well man"; _Pennsylvania Gazette_, Mar. 10. Mar. 9, Haddon libels the plunder (doc. no. 184). Mar. 31, the admiralty judge decrees that it shall be his, provided no better claimant arises within a year and a day, and provided he furnishes sureties to the register of the court to the value of L2409. 4s. 11d.; notes of Sir William Burrell on this case in _Reports of Cases determined by the High Court of Admiralty and upon Appeal therefrom, temp. Sir Thomas Saulsbury and Sir George Hay_, ed. R.G. Marsden (London, 1885), pp. 185-186. July 26, 1757, the sureties present their account of sales (doc. no. 186). Feb. 17, 1758, and Mar. 10, on pressure from London, where Captain Ybanez has made his complaint, the advocate general in New York files a claim for money and goods, in the king's name, to restore them to the Spaniards. Apr. 5, the sureties demur. Apr. 19, the judge dismisses the advocate general's claim. Sept. 27, 1758, Ybanez files his own claim or libel (doc. no. 188), but the judge rules Feb. 10, 1759, that his time had expired (Marsden, _loc. cit._). Dec. 19, 1760, the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes reverse the colonial court, and condemn the captor in costs and dam
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508  
509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

sureties

 

Ybanez

 
Haddon
 

commission

 
advocate
 

general

 

Rosario

 

Virgen

 

London

 

provided


Marsden

 
Miller
 

Thomas

 

Richard

 
admiralty
 
history
 
Reports
 

determined

 

Burrell

 
Causes

William
 

decrees

 

therefrom

 

Saulsbury

 
Appeal
 
Admiralty
 

reverse

 

colonial

 

furnishes

 

arises


claimant
 

condemn

 

George

 

captor

 

register

 

opportunity

 

expired

 

complaint

 

Captain

 
restore

Spaniards

 
Appeals
 
dismisses
 

present

 

pressure

 
account
 

Commissioners

 
Nathaniel
 

Marston

 
Jasper