FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152  
153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   >>   >|  
eturned into court after an absence of forty minutes. The judge, who was waiting in his private room, was informed, and he entered the court and resumed his seat. The jury answered to their names, and then the Clerk of Arraigns, in a sing-song voice, said: "Gentlemen, have you agreed upon your verdict? Do you find the prisoner guilty or not guilty of wilful murder?" "Guilty!" answered the foreman, in a loud, clear voice. "You say that he is guilty of murder, and that is the verdict of you all?" "That is the verdict of us all," was the response. "James Ronald Penreath," continued the clerk, turning to the accused man, and speaking in the same sing-song tones of one who repeated a formula by rote, "you stand convicted of the crime of wilful murder. Have you anything to say for yourself why the Court should not give you judgment of death according to law?" The man in the dock, who had turned very pale, merely shook his head. The judge, with expressionless face and in an expressionless voice, pronounced sentence of death. CHAPTER XVII Colwyn returned to Durrington in a perplexed and dissatisfied frame of mind. The trial, which he had attended and followed closely, had failed to convince him that all the facts concerning the death of Roger Glenthorpe had been brought to light. Really, the trial had not been a trial at all, but merely a battle of lawyers about the state of Penreath's mind. If Penreath was really sane--and Colwyn, who had watched him closely during the trial, believed that he was--the Crown theory of the murder by no means accounted for all the amazing facts of the case. Should he have done more? Colwyn asked himself this question again and again. But that query always led to another one--_Could_ he have done more? In his mental probings the detective could rarely get away from the point--and when he did get away from it he always returned to it--that Penreath, by his dogged silence, had been largely responsible for his own conviction. If a man, charged with murder, refused to account for actions which pointed to him as the murderer, how could anybody help him? Silence, in certain circumstances, was the strongest presumptive proof of guilt. A man was the best judge of his own actions and, if he refused to speak when his own life might pay the forfeit for silence, he must have the strongest possible reason for holding his tongue. What other reason could Penreath have except the con
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152  
153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

murder

 
Penreath
 

guilty

 

Colwyn

 

verdict

 

wilful

 

refused

 

actions

 

expressionless

 

silence


returned

 

answered

 

reason

 

closely

 

strongest

 

lawyers

 

question

 

battle

 

theory

 

amazing


believed

 

Should

 

accounted

 

watched

 

responsible

 

circumstances

 

presumptive

 

tongue

 

holding

 

forfeit


Silence

 

detective

 
rarely
 
probings
 

mental

 

dogged

 

largely

 

murderer

 

pointed

 

account


conviction

 

charged

 

CHAPTER

 

Guilty

 

foreman

 

prisoner

 

continued

 

turning

 

accused

 
Ronald