FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942  
943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   >>   >|  
whereby His body was fashioned, it was impossible for anything derived from His body to have the instrumental power of forming that very body. Likewise in creation there was no term wherein the instrumental action of a creature could be received. Consequently there is no comparison. Reply Obj. 3: The aforesaid words, which work the consecration, operate sacramentally. Consequently, the converting power latent under the forms of these sacraments follows the meaning, which is terminated in the uttering of the last word. And therefore the aforesaid words have this power in the last instant of their being uttered, taken in conjunction with those uttered before. And this power is simple by reason of the thing signified, although there be composition in the words uttered outwardly. _______________________ FIFTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 78, Art. 5] Whether the Aforesaid Expressions Are True? Objection 1: It seems that the aforesaid expressions are not true. Because when we say: "This is My body," the word "this" designates a substance. But according to what was said above (AA. 1, 4, ad 3; Q. 75, AA. 2, 7), when the pronoun "this" is spoken, the substance of the bread is still there, because the transubstantiation takes place in the last instant of pronouncing the words. But it is false to say: "Bread is Christ's body." Consequently this expression, "This is My body," is false. Obj. 2: Further, the pronoun "this" appeals to the senses. But the sensible species in this sacrament are neither Christ's body nor even its accidents. Therefore this expression, "This is My body," cannot be true. Obj. 3: Further, as was observed above (A. 4, ad 3), these words, by their signification, effect the change of the bread into the body of Christ. But an effective cause is understood as preceding its effect. Therefore the meaning of these words is understood as preceding the change of the bread into the body of Christ. But previous to the change this expression, "This is My body," is false. Therefore the expression is to be judged as false simply; and the same reason holds good of the other phrase: "This is the chalice of My blood," etc. _On the contrary,_ These words are pronounced in the person of Christ, Who says of Himself (John 14:6): "I am the truth." _I answer that,_ There have been many opinions on this point. Some have said that in this expression, "This is My body," the word "this" implies demonstration as conceived, and n
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942  
943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Christ

 

expression

 

aforesaid

 

Consequently

 

change

 

Therefore

 

uttered

 
instrumental
 
substance
 
reason

understood

 

preceding

 

effect

 

pronoun

 

Further

 

instant

 

meaning

 

effective

 
action
 

signification


comparison

 

simply

 

creature

 
judged
 

previous

 

species

 

sacrament

 

senses

 
appeals
 

fashioned


accidents

 

observed

 

answer

 

opinions

 
conceived
 
demonstration
 

implies

 

chalice

 

phrase

 

contrary


Himself

 

pronounced

 

person

 

uttering

 
ARTICLE
 

Whether

 

Aforesaid

 

terminated

 
Objection
 

Expressions