FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887  
888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   >>   >|  
s sacrament. _On the contrary,_ Augustine says in his book on the Sentences of Prosper (Lanfranc, De Corp. et Sang. Dom. xiii): "Under the species which we behold, of bread and wine, we honor invisible things, i.e. flesh and blood." _I answer that,_ It is evident to sense that all the accidents of the bread and wine remain after the consecration. And this is reasonably done by Divine providence. First of all, because it is not customary, but horrible, for men to eat human flesh, and to drink blood. And therefore Christ's flesh and blood are set before us to be partaken of under the species of those things which are the more commonly used by men, namely, bread and wine. Secondly, lest this sacrament might be derided by unbelievers, if we were to eat our Lord under His own species. Thirdly, that while we receive our Lord's body and blood invisibly, this may redound to the merit of faith. Reply Obj. 1: As is said in the book _De Causis,_ an effect depends more on the first cause than on the second. And therefore by God's power, which is the first cause of all things, it is possible for that which follows to remain, while that which is first is taken away. Reply Obj. 2: There is no deception in this sacrament; for the accidents which are discerned by the senses are truly present. But the intellect, whose proper object is substance as is said in _De Anima_ iii, is preserved by faith from deception. And this serves as answer to the third argument; because faith is not contrary to the senses, but concerns things to which sense does not reach. Reply Obj. 4: This change has not properly a subject, as was stated above (A. 4, ad 1); nevertheless the accidents which remain have some resemblance of a subject. _______________________ SIXTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 75, Art. 6] Whether the Substantial Form of the Bread Remains in This Sacrament After the Consecration? Objection 1: It seems that the substantial form of the bread remains in this sacrament after the consecration. For it has been said (A. 5) that the accidents remain after the consecration. But since bread is an artificial thing, its form is an accident. Therefore it remains after the consecration. Obj. 2: Further, the form of Christ's body is His soul: for it is said in _De Anima_ ii, that the soul "is the act of a physical body which has life in potentiality". But it cannot be said that the substantial form of the bread is changed into the soul. Therefore
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887  
888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

things

 

sacrament

 

consecration

 

remain

 

accidents

 

species

 

deception

 
senses
 
Christ
 
subject

Therefore

 

answer

 

remains

 

contrary

 

substantial

 

physical

 

change

 

artificial

 
accident
 

Further


concerns

 

changed

 

potentiality

 
substance
 

object

 

proper

 

preserved

 

argument

 
serves
 

Consecration


Objection

 

Whether

 

Substantial

 

Remains

 
Sacrament
 
stated
 

ARTICLE

 

resemblance

 

properly

 

redound


Divine

 

providence

 

evident

 

customary

 
partaken
 

horrible

 

invisible

 

Sentences

 
Prosper
 

Lanfranc