FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>  
Day_, &c. These Lines of _Spencer_ and those of _Philips_, both contain agreeable Images and Thoughts, yet are they as different as _Milton_ and _D'Urfey_. I shall only make one Observation on this difference. Namely, that in the soft and beautiful Lines of _Philips_, each Word, only signifies a soft and beautiful Idea; As _Breath, Waters, Flow, Gently, Soft_, &c. but in _Spencer_ the sound also is soft. Had such an Author dress'd this inimitable Thought of _Philips_, the Line would have glided as smooth and easy off the Tongue, as the Waters he mentions, do along the Meadows. SECT. II. _That no Language is so fit for Pastoral as the English_. I have before observed, that this softness is effected, among other things by little Words; yet I cannot help observing here, that our Language is infinitely the finest of any in the World for Pastoral, and it's abounding so much in little Words is one Reason of it. The Pomps and Stateliness of the Latin Lines could not have been made proper for Pastoral, unless entirely alter'd, and 'tis not likely that a Genius daring enough to do that would engage in Pastoral. The _Romans_ had not a Particle, as we have, before their _Substantives_; As _A_ and _The Tree_. Seldom used a Word before the Verbs; as _He goes_, _They go_. Nor had they our _Doth_ and _Does_; without which no _Englishman_ could form a Pastoral Language. As the sweet Simplicity of that Line, I have just quoted, is occasion'd by nothing else. _A Shepherd-boy (no better do him call_.) The _Greek_ Language was greatly more fit for Pastoral than the _Latin_. Among other Reasons, because the former had so many Particles; and could render their Language uncommon, by their different Dialects, and by their various Methods of changing, and of compounding Words. Which no Language will admit of in an equal degree, besides the _English_. But then the _Greek_ Language is too sonorous for Pastoral. Give me leave to show the inimitable softness and sweetness of the _English_ Tongue, only by instancing in one Word. Which will also show how copious a Language ours is. I know but three Words the _Greeks_ had to express the Word Lad or Swain by: [Greek: Agrikos, Poimruos; and Bokolos]; and how sonorous are they all. We have six; Swain, Boy, Shepherd, Youth, Stripling, Lad; and how inimitably soft is the sound of 'em all. _Theocritus_ has more Turns of Words or Phrazes than _Spencer_; yet he could in none of 'em co
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>  



Top keywords:
Language
 

Pastoral

 

Spencer

 

English

 

Philips

 

sonorous

 
Tongue
 
softness
 

inimitable

 
Shepherd

Waters

 

beautiful

 
greatly
 

Theocritus

 

Stripling

 

Reasons

 

inimitably

 

Simplicity

 
quoted
 
occasion

Englishman

 

Phrazes

 
uncommon
 
degree
 

express

 

Greeks

 

copious

 
instancing
 

sweetness

 

Dialects


render

 

Particles

 

Methods

 

Bokolos

 
Poimruos
 

Agrikos

 
changing
 

compounding

 
Stateliness
 

Author


Thought

 

Breath

 

Gently

 
glided
 

smooth

 

Meadows

 

mentions

 

signifies

 

agreeable

 
Images