dissolved. Hence the complete picture they
give of life is of necessity fallacious; they can only represent what
is unusual. However democratic they may be, they are only concerned with
the minority.

The incident of the religious fanatic who broke a window on Ludgate Hill
was alone enough to set them up in good copy for the night. But when the
same man was brought before a magistrate and defied his enemy to
mortal combat in the open court, then the columns would hardly hold the
excruciating information, and the headlines were so large that there was
hardly room for any of the text. The _Daily Telegraph_ headed a column,
"A Duel on Divinity," and there was a correspondence afterwards which
lasted for months, about whether police magistrates ought to mention
religion. The _Daily Mail_ in its dull, sensible way, headed the events,
"Wanted to fight for the Virgin." Mr. James Douglas, in _The Star_,
presuming on his knowledge of philosophical and theological terms,
described the Christian's outbreak under the title of "Dualist and
Duellist." The _Daily News_ inserted a colourless account of the matter,
but was pursued and eaten up for some weeks, with letters from outlying
ministers, headed "Murder and Mariolatry." But the journalistic
temperature was steadily and consistently heated by all these
influences; the journalists had tasted blood, prospectively, and were
in the mood for more; everything in the matter prepared them for further
outbursts of moral indignation. And when a gasping reporter rushed in in
the last hours of the evening with the announcement that the two heroes
of the Police Court had literally been found fighting in a London back
garden, with a shopkeeper bound and gagged in the front of the house,
the editors and sub-editors were stricken still as men are by great
beatitudes.

The next morning, five or six of the great London dailies burst out
simultaneously into great blossoms of eloquent leader-writing. Towards
the end all the leaders tended to be the same, but they all began
differently. The _Daily Telegraph_, for instance began, "There will
be little difference among our readers or among all truly English and
law-abiding men touching the, etc. etc." The _Daily Mail_ said, "People
must learn, in the modern world, to keep their theological differences
to themselves. The fracas, etc. etc." The _Daily News_ started, "Nothing
could be more inimical to the cause of true religion than, etc. etc."
The _Ti