FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830  
831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   >>   >|  
ion of the members and colors, the other resulting from outward refulgence supervening, so too, in the soul, there is a twofold comeliness, one habitual and, so to speak, intrinsic, the other actual like an outward flash of light. Now venial sin is a hindrance to actual comeliness, but not to habitual comeliness, because it neither destroys nor diminishes the habit of charity and of the other virtues, as we shall show further on (II-II, Q. 24, A. 10; Q. 133, A. 1, ad 2), but only hinders their acts. On the other hand a stain denotes something permanent in the thing stained, wherefore it seems in the nature of a loss of habitual rather than of actual comeliness. Therefore, properly speaking, venial sin does not cause a stain in the soul. If, however, we find it stated anywhere that it does induce a stain, this is in a restricted sense, in so far as it hinders the comeliness that results from acts of virtue. Reply Obj. 1: Augustine is speaking of the case in which many venial sins lead to mortal sin dispositively: because otherwise they would not sever the soul from its heavenly spouse. Reply Obj. 2: In mortal sin the inordinateness of the act destroys the habit of virtue, but not in venial sin. Reply Obj. 3: In mortal sin the soul comes into contact with a temporal thing as its end, so that the shedding of the light of grace, which accrues to those who, by charity, cleave to God as their last end, is entirely cut off. _On the contrary,_ in venial sin, man does not cleave to a creature as his last end: hence there is no comparison. ________________________ SECOND ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 89, Art. 2] Whether Venial Sins Are Suitably Designated As "Wood, Hay, and Stubble"? Objection 1: It would seem that venial sins are unsuitably designated as "wood, hay, and stubble." Because wood, hay, and stubble are said (1 Cor. 3:12) to be built on a spiritual foundation. Now venial sins are something outside a spiritual foundation, even as false opinions are outside the pale of science. Therefore, venial sins are not suitably designated as wood, hay, and stubble. Obj. 2: Further, he who builds wood, hay, and stubble, "shall be saved yet so as by fire" (1 Cor. 3:15). But sometimes the man who commits a venial sin, will not be saved, even by fire, e.g. when a man dies in mortal sin to which venial sins are attached. Therefore, venial sins are unsuitably designated by wood, hay, and stubble. Obj. 3: Further, according to th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830  
831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

venial

 

comeliness

 

stubble

 

mortal

 

actual

 

habitual

 

Therefore

 
designated
 
speaking
 
spiritual

foundation

 

unsuitably

 

Further

 

cleave

 

virtue

 

charity

 

destroys

 

hinders

 
outward
 

Stubble


hindrance

 

supervening

 

Objection

 
comparison
 

SECOND

 

ARTICLE

 

creature

 

colors

 
Suitably
 

Venial


Whether

 

Designated

 

commits

 

attached

 
builds
 
Because
 

intrinsic

 

suitably

 

science

 

opinions


members

 

stated

 

induce

 

results

 
restricted
 

properly

 

permanent

 

denotes

 
stained
 

nature